From: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>
To: Vladimir Lazarenko <vlad@lazarenko.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sata_nv + SMP = broken?
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:16:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4359144F.8090504@perkel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4358C417.9000608@lazarenko.net>
Vladimir Lazarenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yesterday I've tried launching various kernels on Ahtlon64 Dual-core
> X2 3800+ with MSI Neo4 Platinum SLI motherboard.
>
> The results were a total catastrophica failure. As soon as I enable
> SMP in the kernel, the sata driver would randomly hang after a bit of
> disk activity.
>
> Whenever apic is enabled, the system won't even be able to boot up
> completely, and will hang VERY soon. Whenever I disable apic, the
> system is able to bootup, but when the software mirror that I use will
> try to resync for 2-3-10 mins, it will throw up a message and freeze
> again.
>
> Whenever I disable apic AND lapic, the system is able to bootup AND
> work, however after same 5-10 minutes it start spitting messages,
> which are somewhat different thou and don't hang the system completely
> but render it rather unusable anyway.
>
> As soon as I disable SMP - everything works like a charm.
>
For what it's worth I too have seen this same problem. It happens when I
use the stock Fedora kernels but not my custom compiled kernel. I'm not
sure what I compiled differently but at the time I thought that
something in the new kernel fixed it.
I too am running an Athlon X2 using sata_nv. I have an ASUS motherboard.
But what I noticed was that the problem went away if I used 2 gigs of
ram instead of 4 gigs. When you use the whole 4 gigs there is some
memory mapping going on and I thought perhaps the problem was related to
the sata_nv not liking the memory mapped over the 4gig barrier. I did
not try disabling SMP.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-21 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-21 10:33 sata_nv + SMP = broken? Vladimir Lazarenko
2005-10-21 12:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-21 16:16 ` Marc Perkel [this message]
2005-10-21 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-21 20:46 ` Vladimir Lazarenko
2005-10-22 9:15 ` Vladimir Lazarenko
2005-10-22 18:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-22 19:59 ` Vladimir Lazarenko
2005-10-26 1:03 ` Vladimir Lazarenko
2005-10-26 9:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-26 12:01 ` Vladimir Lazarenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-26 18:34 Allen Martin
2005-10-26 19:49 ` Vladimir Lazarenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4359144F.8090504@perkel.com \
--to=marc@perkel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vlad@lazarenko.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox