public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Seger <Mark.Seger@hp.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Patch for inconsistent recording of block device statistics]
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:43:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <435D0F45.90906@hp.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 323 bytes --]

This patch was discussed back in march, and I still haven't seen it show 
up in the source pool.  I was wondering if it just feel through the 
cracks or if it was planned for a specific future release.  If the 
attached doesn't provide enough context for you to remember what this is 
all about, just let me know...
-mark


[-- Attachment #2: Re: Patch for inconsistent recording of block device statistics --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4998 bytes --]

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Mark Seger <Mark.Seger@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch for inconsistent recording of block device statistics
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:19:16 +0100
Message-ID: <20050323091916.GO24105@suse.de>

On Tue, Mar 22 2005, Mark Seger wrote:
> The read/write statistics for both sectors and merges are calculated at 
> the time requests first enter the request queue but the remainder of the 
> statistics, such as the number of read/writes are calculated at the time 
> the I/O completes.  As a result, one cannot accurately determine the 
> data rates read or written at the actual time the I/O is performed.  
> This behavior is masked with smaller queue sizes but is very real and 
> was very noticeable with earlier 2.6 kenels using the cfq scheduler 
> which had a default queue size of 8192 where the time difference between 
> these sets of counters could exceed 10 seconds for large file writes and 
> small monitoring intervals such as 1 second.  In that environment, one 
> would see extremely high bursts of I/O, sometimes exceeding 500 or even 
> 1000 MB/sec for the first second or two and then drop to 0 for a long 
> time while the 'number of operations' counters accurately reflect what 
> is really happening.
> 
> The attached patch fixes this problem by simply accumulating the 
> read/write sector/merge data in temporary variables stored in the 
> request queue entry, and when the I/O completes copies those values to 
> the disk statistics block.

I don't like this patch, it adds 4 * sizeof(unsigned long) to struct
request when it can be solved without adding anything. The idea is
sound, though, the current way the stats are done isn't very
interesting.

How about accounting merges the way we currently do it, since that piece
of the stats _is_ interesting at queueing time. And then account
completion in __end_that_request_first(). Untested patch attached.

===== drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c 1.287 vs edited =====
--- 1.287/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2005-03-11 21:32:27 +01:00
+++ edited/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2005-03-23 10:10:39 +01:00
@@ -2294,16 +2293,12 @@
 	if (!blk_fs_request(rq) || !rq->rq_disk)
 		return;
 
-	if (rw == READ) {
-		__disk_stat_add(rq->rq_disk, read_sectors, nr_sectors);
-		if (!new_io)
+	if (!new_io) {
+		if (rw == READ)
 			__disk_stat_inc(rq->rq_disk, read_merges);
-	} else if (rw == WRITE) {
-		__disk_stat_add(rq->rq_disk, write_sectors, nr_sectors);
-		if (!new_io)
+		else
 			__disk_stat_inc(rq->rq_disk, write_merges);
-	}
-	if (new_io) {
+	} else {
 		disk_round_stats(rq->rq_disk);
 		rq->rq_disk->in_flight++;
 	}
@@ -3063,6 +3069,13 @@
 				(unsigned long long)req->sector);
 	}
 
+	if (blk_fs_request(req)) {
+		if (rq_data_dir(req) == READ)
+			__disk_stat_add(req->rq_disk, read_sectors, nr_bytes >> 9);
+		else
+			__disk_stat_add(req->rq_disk, write_sectors, nr_bytes >> 9);
+	}
+
 	total_bytes = bio_nbytes = 0;
 	while ((bio = req->bio) != NULL) {
 		int nbytes;

-- 
Jens Axboe

             reply	other threads:[~2005-10-24 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-24 16:43 Mark Seger [this message]
2005-10-25  6:40 ` [Fwd: Re: Patch for inconsistent recording of block device statistics] Jens Axboe
2005-10-25 18:33   ` Mark Seger
2005-10-31 19:08     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=435D0F45.90906@hp.com \
    --to=mark.seger@hp.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox