Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector

[Jay Lan <jlan@engr.sgi.com>]

Matt Helsley wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 18:48 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
>  
>>* Matt Helsley (matthltc@us.ibm.com) wrote:
>>    
>>>	It seems to me that this is the consensus here and on LSE-Tech.
>>>This patch addresses the needs of ELSA and CKRM and is amenable to using
>>>the patches recently proposed on lse-tech to pull out the common piece.
>>>      
>>Sounds good.  What about the SGI needs (for PAGG)?  They just posted
>>pnotify pretty recently.   Or is that what you mean by consensus and
>>possible use of 'task notifiers'?
>>    

Hi,

Jesse is no longer with SGI.

Please cc erikj(PAGG & task_notifier) and jlan(CSA) on discussion
related to process
event notifier.

Thanks!
- jay

>>thanks,
>>-chris
>>    
>
>	If this patch used pnotify it would be much more complicated and it
>would need to attach small pieces of data to each task. However there
>have been some alternative proposals. The 'task_notifier' patch posted
>by Jack Steiner was much closer to what this patch needs:
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lse-tech&m=112869558116290&w=2
>
>	'task_notifier' is smaller and easier to review but still requires
>per-task data that would complicate the Process Events Connector patch.
>There has been some discussion in the above thread on how to address the
>per-task data/notification needs of PAGG and the all-task notification
>needs of ELSA and CKRM.
>
>Cheers,
>	-Matt Helsley
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
>Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
>Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
>Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
>_______________________________________________
>ckrm-tech mailing list
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
>