From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:32:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:31:54 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:7106 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:31:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:32:06 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Shawn Starr , Linux Subject: Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree Message-ID: <4360000.1014687125@flay> In-Reply-To: <1014686150.18834.2.camel@coredump> In-Reply-To: <200202260135.18913.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <1014686150.18834.2.camel@coredump> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Not to begin the flamewar, but no thanks. rmap-12f blows -aa away AFAIK > on this P200 w/ 64MB ram. rmap still sucks on large systems though. I'd love to see rmap in the main kernel, but it needs to get the scalability fixed first. The main problem seems to be pagemap_lru_lock ... Rik & crew know about this problem, but let's give them some time to fix it before rmap gets put into mainline .... Martin.