From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tony@atomide.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] HW RNG cleanup & new drivers
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:09:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4363F31F.2040303@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051029191229.562454000@omelas>
Deepak Saxena wrote:
> This patch adds support to the kernel for some more HW RNG devices
> and cleans up the code a bit. My basic goal was to keep the same
> user space interface as exists, but not have to reproduce all
> the same 100 lines of user space interface code across every new
> driver (as we currently do with watchdogs...)
>
> The new code separates the HW specific driver from the user
> interface code and just adds a few function pointers so that
> the two can talk to each other. I opted out of using a sysfs
> class and all that complication b/c there will be one and only
> one RNG device at a time on a given system.
>
> I've added drivers for Intels' IXP4xx and for the TI OMAP and
> these have both been tested.
I would prefer to let this live in -mm at least for a little while.
Confirmation from AMD, Intel and VIA owners would be really nice, too.
AMD and Intel might be a little bit hard to find. I think Peter Anvin
had an Intel ICH w/ RNG at one time...
> There was some discussion on lkml on the subject of killing
> the in-kernel driver and moving the whole implementation to
> user space but that cannot be done as some SOCs (MPC85xx for
> example) have the RNG unit as part of a larger device that
> needs kernel space code to manage command descriptor rings
> and other such things. We also want to be able to suspend/resume
> the RNG devices (see OMAP driver) and that needs to be done as part
> of the kernel PM path.
None of this precludes having this stuff in userspace.
That said, I don't object to your code being an intermediate step.
Jeff (hw_random author)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-29 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-29 19:12 [patch 0/5] HW RNG cleanup & new drivers Deepak Saxena
2005-10-29 19:12 ` [patch 1/5] Remove existing hw_random implementation Deepak Saxena
2005-10-29 19:12 ` [patch 2/5] Core HW RNG support Deepak Saxena
2002-01-01 5:46 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-29 19:12 ` [patch 3/5] Intel IXP4xx driver Deepak Saxena
2005-10-29 19:12 ` [patch 4/5] x86 driver Deepak Saxena
2005-10-29 19:12 ` [patch 5/5] TI OMAP driver Deepak Saxena
2005-10-29 22:09 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-10-29 22:25 ` [patch 0/5] HW RNG cleanup & new drivers Linus Torvalds
2005-10-29 22:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-30 19:58 ` Deepak Saxena
2005-10-30 0:23 ` Gene Heskett
2005-10-30 14:31 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-10-30 18:08 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2005-10-30 19:35 ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-10-30 20:02 ` Deepak Saxena
2005-10-30 22:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-30 23:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4363F31F.2040303@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dsaxena@plexity.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox