From: Evgeny Stambulchik <Evgeny.Stambulchik@weizmann.ac.il>
To: jonathan@jonmasters.org
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix floppy.c to store correct ro/rw status in underlying gendisk
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:57:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43660693.6040601@weizmann.ac.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35fb2e590510291035n297aa22cv303ae77baeb5c213@mail.gmail.com>
Jon Masters wrote:
> Let me know if this fixes it for you - should bomb out now if you try.
> The error isn't the cleanest (blame mount), but it does fail.
This works fine, thanks! For what it worth, though, mount -o remount,rw
says remounting read-only yet still returns success. (Opposite to
busybox, which now says "Permission denied" - rather misleading, but at
least it fails).
My question is, shouldn't it be implemented at a more generic level?
Floppy is just one example. Others are all kind of USB storage, ZIP/Jazz
drives, and even normal SCSI disks (which have a RO jumper - at least
some of them do).
I got an ancient USB disk on key with a write-protection switch. When I
plug it in in the RO mode, everything goes exactly as it was (before
your patch) with floppy. Now something interesting:
1. The thingy is plugged in RW and mounted
2. While connected, I switch it to RO
dmesg says:
-> SCSI device sda: 129024 512-byte hdwr sectors (66 MB)
-> sda: Write Protect is on
-> sda: Mode Sense: 03 00 80 00
-> sda: assuming drive cache: write through
3.
# mount -o remount,rw /mnt
mount: block device /dev/sda1 is write-protected, mounting read-only
# echo $?
0
So it seems there is some layer in bd which does know about RO status
(and furthermore it's set by hot events)?
Regards,
Evgeny
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-31 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-29 17:25 [PATCH] fix floppy.c to store correct ro/rw status in underlying gendisk Jon Masters
[not found] ` <35fb2e590510291035n297aa22cv303ae77baeb5c213@mail.gmail.com>
2005-10-31 11:57 ` Evgeny Stambulchik [this message]
2005-10-31 15:58 ` Jon Masters
2005-10-31 23:17 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-01 2:36 ` Jon Masters
2005-11-01 7:21 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-01 13:53 ` Evgeny Stambulchik
2005-11-01 17:32 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43660693.6040601@weizmann.ac.il \
--to=evgeny.stambulchik@weizmann.ac.il \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox