public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Christian de Rivaz <jc@eclis.ch>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dean@arctic.org
Subject: Re: NTP broken with 2.6.14
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 01:45:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43695D94.10901@eclis.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1130976935.27168.512.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>

john stultz a écrit :
> On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 00:37 +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> 
>>john stultz a écrit :
>>
>>>On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 00:05 +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Since I have installed the new kernel 2.6.14, ntpd is unable to
>>>>synchronize the time:
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm working to see if I can reproduce this. Is this with 2.6.14 vanilla,
>>>or from Linus' git tree post 2.6.14?
>>
>>This is a vanilla 2.6.14 kernel from Linus git tree.
>>The architecture is i386:
>>Linux talla 2.6.14 #1 PREEMPT Tue Nov 1 17:27:04 CET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
> 
> 
> I can't seem to trivially reproduce this.
> 
> 
> Your ntpq associations output looks suspicious, though. 
> ind assID status  conf reach auth condition  last_event cnt
> ===========================================================
>    1 14484  9014   yes   yes  none    reject   reachable  1
> 
> That reject condition seems odd.
> 
> 
> What does running "ntpdate -uq <server>" produce?

First I have rebooted with a new kernel 2.6.14 that have the patch 
pointed out by Dean Gaudet, this don't change the problem.

On the machine with 2.6.14:

talla:~# uname -a
Linux talla 2.6.14-1 #2 PREEMPT Thu Nov 3 00:54:44 CET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
talla:~# ntpdate -uq 10.0.0.1
server 10.0.0.1, stratum 3, offset -14.893095, delay 0.02644
  3 Nov 01:31:59 ntpdate[8186]: step time server 10.0.0.1 offset 
-14.893095 sec
talla:~# ntpdate -uq 129.132.2.21
server 129.132.2.21, stratum 2, offset -14.907672, delay 0.04263
  3 Nov 01:32:00 ntpdate[8187]: step time server 129.132.2.21 offset 
-14.907672 sec

> 
> Also, could you check 2.6.13, or even better do a binary search of
> mainline releases since 2.6.8 to narrow down where this broke for you?

On the others machines using the same server:

craie:~# uname -a
Linux craie 2.4.27-pre2-7-k7 #1 lun mai 17 00:08:15 CEST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
craie:~# ntpdate -uq 10.0.0.1
server 10.0.0.1, stratum 3, offset 0.000046, delay 0.02641
  3 Nov 01:31:38 ntpdate[16783]: adjust time server 10.0.0.1 offset 
0.000046 sec
craie:~# ntpdate -uq 129.132.2.21
server 129.132.2.21, stratum 2, offset -0.013689, delay 0.04294
  3 Nov 01:31:39 ntpdate[16786]: adjust time server 129.132.2.21 offset 
-0.013689 sec

citron:~# uname -a
Linux citron 2.6.12-nfs-1 #1 Fri Jun 24 18:23:39 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
citron:~# ntpdate -uq 10.0.0.1
server 10.0.0.1, stratum 3, offset 0.003676, delay 0.02647
  3 Nov 01:32:06 ntpdate[13476]: adjust time server 10.0.0.1 offset 
0.003676 sec
citron:~# ntpdate -uq 129.132.2.21
server 129.132.2.21, stratum 2, offset -0.010485, delay 0.04341
  3 Nov 01:32:11 ntpdate[13477]: adjust time server 129.132.2.21 offset 
-0.010485 sec

So this could to be something after the 2.6.12. All machines run the 
same version of ntpd and use the same configuration file.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean-Christian de Rivaz

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-03  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-02 23:05 NTP broken with 2.6.14 Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-02 23:21 ` john stultz
2005-11-02 23:37   ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03  0:15     ` john stultz
2005-11-03  0:45       ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz [this message]
2005-11-03  1:07         ` john stultz
2005-11-03  2:26           ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 19:32             ` john stultz
2005-11-03 19:51               ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-03 20:11                 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 20:48                   ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-03 21:00                     ` john stultz
2005-11-03 21:12                       ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-03 21:28                   ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 21:12               ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 21:41                 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 22:10                   ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 22:54                     ` john stultz
2005-11-04  0:15                       ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-04  0:40                         ` john stultz
2005-11-04  2:50                           ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-06 22:49                             ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2005-11-07 21:44                               ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-04 12:40                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-11-02 23:24 ` john stultz
2005-11-03  0:36 ` Roman Zippel
2005-11-03  1:13   ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03  9:42     ` Roman Zippel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-04  3:44 Brown, Len
2005-11-04  4:07 ` john stultz
2005-11-04 13:51   ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-04 16:39   ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-04 17:41     ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43695D94.10901@eclis.ch \
    --to=jc@eclis.ch \
    --cc=dean@arctic.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox