From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [BLOCK] Unify the seperate read/write io stat fields into arrays
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 22:22:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <436AD3F6.2050501@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511021704.jA2H4X4u027306@hera.kernel.org>
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> tree fe4ce823e638ded151edcb142f28a240860f0d33
> parent d72d904a5367ad4ca3f2c9a2ce8c3a68f0b28bf0
> author Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:26:16 +0100
> committer Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:26:16 +0100
>
> [BLOCK] Unify the seperate read/write io stat fields into arrays
>
> Instead of having ->read_sectors and ->write_sectors, combine the two
> into ->sectors[2] and similar for the other fields. This saves a branch
> several places in the io path, since we don't have to care for what the
> actual io direction is. On my x86-64 box, that's 200 bytes less text in
> just the core (not counting the various drivers).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
>
> drivers/block/genhd.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c | 40 ++++++++++++----------------------------
> drivers/md/linear.c | 10 +++-------
> drivers/md/md.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/md/multipath.c | 10 +++-------
> drivers/md/raid0.c | 10 +++-------
> drivers/md/raid1.c | 12 ++++--------
> drivers/md/raid10.c | 12 ++++--------
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 10 +++-------
> drivers/md/raid6main.c | 12 ++++--------
> fs/partitions/check.c | 7 ++++---
> include/linux/genhd.h | 10 +++++-----
> 12 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/genhd.c b/drivers/block/genhd.c
> index 486ce1f..54aec4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/genhd.c
> @@ -391,13 +391,12 @@ static ssize_t disk_stats_read(struct ge
> "%8u %8u %8llu %8u "
> "%8u %8u %8u"
> "\n",
> - disk_stat_read(disk, reads), disk_stat_read(disk, read_merges),
> - (unsigned long long)disk_stat_read(disk, read_sectors),
> - jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(disk, read_ticks)),
> - disk_stat_read(disk, writes),
> - disk_stat_read(disk, write_merges),
> - (unsigned long long)disk_stat_read(disk, write_sectors),
> - jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(disk, write_ticks)),
> + disk_stat_read(disk, ios[0]), disk_stat_read(disk, merges[0]),
> + (unsigned long long)disk_stat_read(disk, sectors[0]),
> + jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(disk, ticks[0])),
> + disk_stat_read(disk, ios[1]), disk_stat_read(disk, merges[1]),
> + (unsigned long long)disk_stat_read(disk, sectors[1]),
> + jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(disk, ticks[1])),
> disk->in_flight,
> jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(disk, io_ticks)),
> jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(disk, time_in_queue)));
> @@ -583,12 +582,12 @@ static int diskstats_show(struct seq_fil
> preempt_enable();
> seq_printf(s, "%4d %4d %s %u %u %llu %u %u %u %llu %u %u %u %u\n",
> gp->major, n + gp->first_minor, disk_name(gp, n, buf),
> - disk_stat_read(gp, reads), disk_stat_read(gp, read_merges),
> - (unsigned long long)disk_stat_read(gp, read_sectors),
> - jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(gp, read_ticks)),
> - disk_stat_read(gp, writes), disk_stat_read(gp, write_merges),
> - (unsigned long long)disk_stat_read(gp, write_sectors),
> - jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(gp, write_ticks)),
> + disk_stat_read(gp, ios[0]), disk_stat_read(gp, merges[0]),
> + (unsigned long long)disk_stat_read(gp, sectors[0]),
> + jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(gp, ticks[0])),
> + disk_stat_read(gp, ios[1]), disk_stat_read(gp, merges[1]),
> + (unsigned long long)disk_stat_read(gp, sectors[1]),
> + jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(gp, ticks[1])),
> gp->in_flight,
> jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(gp, io_ticks)),
> jiffies_to_msecs(disk_stat_read(gp, time_in_queue)));
While the overall patch is OK, the use of magic numbers makes the code
less readable. fsck if I know whether "[0]" represents read or write.
Please use named constants rather than [0] and [1].
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-04 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200511021704.jA2H4X4u027306@hera.kernel.org>
2005-11-02 18:38 ` [BLOCK] Unify the seperate read/write io stat fields into arrays Chris Wedgwood
2005-11-03 7:31 ` Jens Axboe
2005-11-04 3:22 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-11-04 7:17 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=436AD3F6.2050501@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox