From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751209AbVKEE6e (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:58:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751210AbVKEE6e (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:58:34 -0500 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:16573 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751208AbVKEE6d (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:58:33 -0500 Message-ID: <436C3BF7.1080906@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 23:58:31 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Herbert Xu CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill 8139too kernel thread (sorta) References: <20051031130255.GA26626@havoc.gtf.org> <20051031211143.GA6409@gondor.apana.org.au> <436C2B47.3030505@pobox.com> <20051105042008.GA25823@gondor.apana.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20051105042008.GA25823@gondor.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Herbert Xu wrote: > My only concern is the potential for starvation here should we fail > to obtain the RTNL. Since any local user can hold the RTNL by issuing > rtnetlink requests, it is theoretically possible for the rtl8139 work > to be delayed indefinitely. Yes, but highly unlikely, for very few users, with the negative effects negligible. Jeff