From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
davej@redhat.com, than@redhat.com
Subject: [UPDATED,PATCH 1/1] My tools break here
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:27:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <436FE2F7.7040804@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051107225024.GB10492@mars.ravnborg.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 766 bytes --]
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:56:26PM -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
>
>>I have to revert the recent addition of -imacros to the Makefile to get my
>>tool chain to build. Without the change, below, I get:
>>
>>Note that this looks entirely like a toolchain bug.
>>
>>
>Then fix your toolchain instead of reverting the -imacros patch.
>
>The change has been in -git for a full day and in latest -mm too.
>And so far this is the only report that it breaks - I no one else
>complains it will stay.
>
>
My tool chain is an unmodified RedHat 9 default install with all updates
applied.
Can we at least consider using -include instead of -imacros? I don't
think breaking the compile on this tool chain is a good idea, even if it
is old.
[-- Attachment #2: my-tools-break-here --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2346 bytes --]
I have to revert the recent addition of -imacros to the Makefile to get my
tool chain to build. Without the change, below, I get:
Note that this looks entirely like a toolchain bug. Here is the offending command:
[pid 12163] execve("/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/tradcpp0", ["/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/tradcpp0", "-lang-asm", "-nostdinc", "-Iinclude", "-Iinclude/asm-i386/mach-default", "-D__GNUC__=3", "-D__GNUC_MINOR__=2", "-D__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__=2", "-D__GXX_ABI_VERSION=102", "-D__ELF__", "-Dunix", "-D__gnu_linux__", "-Dlinux", "-D__ELF__", "-D__unix__", "-D__gnu_linux__", "-D__linux__", "-D__unix", "-D__linux", "-Asystem=posix", "-D__NO_INLINE__", "-D__STDC_HOSTED__=1", "-Acpu=i386", "-Amachine=i386", "-Di386", "-D__i386", "-D__i386__", "-D__tune_i386__", "-D__KERNEL__", "-D__ASSEMBLY__", "-isystem", "/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/include", "-imacros", "include/linux/autoconf.h", "-MD", "arch/i386/kernel/.entry.o.d", "arch/i386/kernel/entry.S", "-o", "/tmp/ccOlsFJR.s"]
Which should execute properly, I think. But it does not:
zach-dev:linux-2.6.14-zach-work $ make
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CHK usr/initramfs_list
AS arch/i386/kernel/entry.o
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/tradcpp0: output filename specified twice
make[1]: *** [arch/i386/kernel/entry.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/i386/kernel] Error 2
gcc (GCC) 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)
Deprecating the -imacros fixes the build for me. It does not appear to be a
simple argument overflow problem in trapcpp0, since deprecating all the defines
reproduces the problem as well. Also, switching -imacros to -include fixes the
problem.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Index: linux-2.6.14-zach-work/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.14-zach-work.orig/Makefile 2005-11-07 15:24:35.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.14-zach-work/Makefile 2005-11-07 15:25:33.000000000 -0800
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ AFLAGS_KERNEL =
# Needed to be compatible with the O= option
LINUXINCLUDE := -Iinclude \
$(if $(KBUILD_SRC),-Iinclude2 -I$(srctree)/include) \
- -imacros include/linux/autoconf.h
+ -include include/linux/autoconf.h
CPPFLAGS := -D__KERNEL__ $(LINUXINCLUDE)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-07 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-07 21:56 [PATCH 1/1] My tools break here Zachary Amsden
2005-11-07 22:50 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-07 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-10 10:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-10 20:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-07 23:15 ` Russell King
2005-11-07 23:27 ` Zachary Amsden [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=436FE2F7.7040804@vmware.com \
--to=zach@vmware.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=than@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox