From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] stop_machine() vs. synchronous IPI send deadlock
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:16:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4371DAA1.4040300@sw.ru> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 601 bytes --]
Hello Andrew,
This patch fixes deadlock of stop_machine() vs. synchronous IPI send.
The problem is that stop_machine() disables interrupts before disabling
preemption on other CPUs. So if another CPU is preempted and then calls
something like flush_tlb_all() it will deadlock with CPU doing
stop_machine() and which can't process IPI due to disabled IRQs.
I changed stop_machine() to do the same things exactly as it does on
other CPUs, i.e. it should disable preemption first on _all_ CPUs
including itself and only after that disable IRQs.
Signed-Off-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Kirill
[-- Attachment #2: diff-stopmachine --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 542 bytes --]
--- ./kernel/stop_machine.c.stpmach 2005-11-01 12:06:03.000000000 +0300
+++ ./kernel/stop_machine.c 2005-11-09 13:58:03.000000000 +0300
@@ -114,13 +114,12 @@ static int stop_machine(void)
return ret;
}
- /* Don't schedule us away at this point, please. */
- local_irq_disable();
-
/* Now they are all started, make them hold the CPUs, ready. */
+ preempt_disable();
stopmachine_set_state(STOPMACHINE_PREPARE);
/* Make them disable irqs. */
+ local_irq_disable();
stopmachine_set_state(STOPMACHINE_DISABLE_IRQ);
return 0;
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-09 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 11:16 Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2005-11-09 17:42 ` [PATCH] stop_machine() vs. synchronous IPI send deadlock Kirill Korotaev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4371DAA1.4040300@sw.ru \
--to=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox