From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-mm2
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:28:38 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43749C86.8010009@reub.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051111005513.0dda25f3.akpm@osdl.org>
On 11/11/2005 9:55 p.m., Andrew Morton wrote:
> Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net> wrote:
>> The 2.6.14 with your linus.patch works fine, so it looks like an -mm(1|2)
>> specific problem, which is common to both sky2 and e100 drivers (unlikely to
>> be e100 specific I guess).
>
> That's getting us closer.
>
> Would you be able to revert the git-netdev-all.patch changes in e100.c? To
> do that, take the drivers/net/e100.c from 2.6.14+linus.patch and simply
> overwrite the e100.c in 2.6.14-mm2 with it.
>
> Or, prepare a 2.6.14-mm2 tree and use
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/e100.c, which amounts to
> the same thing.
>
> Thanks.
Unfortunately made no difference.
However I noticed that I had compiled 2.6.14-mm1+2 with a couple of different
and probably significant config options from rc5-mm1:
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y
CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y
I reverted those changes and rebuilt -mm2, and it all seems OK now after 6x
reboots and about 18 or so times removal and reinsertion of the two modules.
The reason for this being on in the config was that PREEMPT and the debug for
it was turned on to find the sd.c oopsing problem I had in -mm1, but it was
obviously not turned off afterwards. I'm not sure it should have *needed* to
be turned off though?
Then to double check I put CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT back into
that same config via menuconfig the way it was originally, made mrproper and
rebuilt, and the network failed to come up at all (again) on boot on first
attempt. This is consistent with both network drivers and not just the e100
failing to function, I think, as either both drivers always work, or both
always fail.
So in summary -
2.6.14-rc5-mm1 (preempt): <didn't test>
2.6.14-rc5-mm1 (no preempt) : works
2.6.14 with linus.patch (preempt): works
2.6.14 with linus.patch (no preempt): works
2.6.14-mm1 (preempt): broken ***
2.6.14-mm1 (no preempt): <didn't test>
2.6.14-mm2 (preempt): broken ***
2.6.14-mm2 (no preempt): works
All tests done with multiple reboots.
-mm2 seems otherwise to be quite OK apart from this issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-11 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-11 4:35 2.6.14-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 5:23 ` 2.6.14-mm2: loop detected in depmod Brice Goglin
2005-11-11 7:52 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-11-12 3:41 ` Brice Goglin
2005-11-11 5:49 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-11 6:07 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 8:28 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-11 8:55 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 13:28 ` Reuben Farrelly [this message]
2005-11-11 8:54 ` 2.6.14-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-11-11 12:33 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2005-11-11 16:40 ` [-mm patch] fs/ocfs2/file.c: make ocfs2_extend_allocation() static Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 17:09 ` [-mm PATCH] slob: add kmem_set_shrinker Yoichi Yuasa
2005-11-11 19:14 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Badari Pulavarty
2005-11-11 19:21 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 19:32 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Badari Pulavarty
2005-11-11 22:32 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Michal Piotrowski
2005-11-11 22:37 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Michal Piotrowski
2005-11-11 23:01 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 23:28 ` [PATCH] nvidiafb: Fix bug in nvidiafb_pan_display Antonino A. Daplas
2005-11-11 23:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-11 23:55 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-11-11 23:54 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-11-11 23:30 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Michal Piotrowski
2005-11-12 0:45 ` 2.6.14-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-11-16 9:04 ` 2.6.14-mm2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2005-11-16 12:56 ` 2.6.14-mm2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2005-11-16 13:17 ` [Lhms-devel] 2.6.14-mm2 Dave Hansen
2005-11-16 16:02 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2005-11-16 16:31 ` Dave Hansen
2005-11-16 16:39 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2005-11-17 0:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2005-11-17 9:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43749C86.8010009@reub.net \
--to=reuben-lkml@reub.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox