Re: Severe VFS Performance Issues 2.6 with > 95000 directory entries

Nikita Danilov
2005-11-13T21:34:44Z

jmerkey writes:
> Nikita Danilov wrote:
>
> >Jeff V. Merkey writes:
> > >
> > > The subject line speaks for itself. This is using standard VFS readdir
> > > and lookup calls through the VFSwith ftp. Very poor.
> >
> >Reiser4 works fine with 100M entries in a directory, so VFS is not a
> >bottleneck here.
> >
> >
>
> how about with ftp running on top? Try running FTP in directory with
> 100M entries. See how long it takes to return the data to
> the remote client for a dir listing.

Why are you thinking that it is VFS that is causing performance
degradation here?

>
> Jeff
>
> >[...]
> >
> > >
> > > Jeff
> >

Nikita.

> >
> >
> >