public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@stesmi.com>
To: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 939 pin Opteron vs. Athlon 64? What's the difference?
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:29:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4378832E.6050105@stesmi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43753726.8060205@perkel.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marc Perkel wrote:
> OK - I'm confused. What is the difference between an Athlon 64 and a 939
> pin Opteron? Or the difference between a 939 pin dual core Athlon and a
> 939 pin dual core opteron?
> 
> I understand that the 940 pin Opterons can be used on multiple processor
> boards. But I just don't get it about using a single opteron.
> 
> Also - while I'm asking - AMD Semprtons now are 64 bit - so what's the
> difference between a 64 bit Sempton and a 64 Bit athlon?
> 

While this is an interesting subject, I ponder what it has to do on the
Linux Kernel development list.

939 pin opterons use unregistered memory and 940 uses registered memory.

Opterons in 939 pin packaging are the same as the FX- chips basically.

64bit Sempron has less cache than 64bit Athlon.

// Stefan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDeIMuBrn2kJu9P78RAvizAKCjqsLK09DzFY5G1DGPXTg8AaLdlwCgsFyz
FtxDVZ7fCANI/gGK+hFVtmA=
=wHHj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-14 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-12  0:28 939 pin Opteron vs. Athlon 64? What's the difference? Marc Perkel
2005-11-12  5:50 ` Joel Jaeggli
2005-11-14 12:29 ` Stefan Smietanowski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4378832E.6050105@stesmi.com \
    --to=stesmi@stesmi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc@perkel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox