Re: nanosleep with small value

[Frank Sorenson <frank@tuxrocks.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dag Nygren wrote:
> But what is the point of having a nanosleep() in that case when you could do
> just fine with usleep() ?

I'd suggest looking into the kthrt patches (which incorporates ktimers
and John Stultz's timeofday patches):  http://www.tglx.de/projects/ktimers/

Running your program, here are some results (latest git tree with the
latest kthrt and timeofday patches):

shortest of 10 runs as non-root:
real    0m0.418s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.003s

longest of 10 runs as non-root:
real    0m0.794s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.002s

shortest of 10 runs as root:
real    0m0.066s
user    0m0.001s
sys     0m0.007s

longest of 10 runs as root:
real    0m0.325s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.004s

Frank
- --
Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK
Systems Manager, Computer Science Department
Brigham Young University
frank@tuxrocks.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDfN49aI0dwg4A47wRAoHxAKDTeMGGnv21qem2Ll+SG8x5q+pV7ACgpUiT
ru0P0KXOet7eNJhLYNRJvpk=
=7IFW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----