Re: nanosleep with small value

Dag Nygren
2005-11-21T07:12:16Z

> Dag Nygren wrote:
> > But what is the point of having a nanosleep() in that case when you could do
> > just fine with usleep() ?
>
> I'd suggest looking into the kthrt patches (which incorporates ktimers
> and John Stultz's timeofday patches): http://www.tglx.de/projects/ktimers/

Thanks for that tip. This completely solved my problem; The program works
again.

There seems to be two "competing" patches out there, but this seems to be the
way
to go as the kernel bunch is behind it.

Best

Dag