From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc: irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com,
xi.pardee@linux.intel.com, Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 10/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Use fixed-size static pmc array
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 16:08:54 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43801499-cf67-4606-4b48-10429dd0f76f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325014819.1283566-11-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2185 bytes --]
On Tue, 24 Mar 2026, David E. Box wrote:
> From: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@linux.intel.com>
>
> Switch pmc_ssram_telems from a devm-allocated pointer to a fixed-size
> static array, eliminating per-probe allocation overhead and simplifying
> lifetime management.
>
> Correspondingly simplify pmc_ssram_telemetry_get_pmc_info() validation to
> check devid availability and tighten input bounds checking. Drop
> null-pointer checks now that the storage is static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> V2 changes:
> - Replaced hardcoded array size [3] with MAX_NUM_PMC constant
>
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> index 1deb4d71da3f..4bfe60ee55ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
>
> DEFINE_FREE(pmc_ssram_telemetry_iounmap, void __iomem *, if (_T) iounmap(_T))
>
> -static struct pmc_ssram_telemetry *pmc_ssram_telems;
> +static struct pmc_ssram_telemetry pmc_ssram_telems[MAX_NUM_PMC];
> static bool device_probed;
>
> static int
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ int pmc_ssram_telemetry_get_pmc_info(unsigned int pmc_idx,
> if (pmc_idx >= MAX_NUM_PMC)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (!pmc_ssram_telems || !pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid)
> + if (!pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> pmc_ssram_telemetry->devid = pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid;
> @@ -153,12 +153,6 @@ static int pmc_ssram_telemetry_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_de
> {
> int ret;
>
> - pmc_ssram_telems = devm_kzalloc(&pcidev->dev, sizeof(*pmc_ssram_telems) * MAX_NUM_PMC,
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!pmc_ssram_telems) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto probe_finish;
> - }
>
> ret = pcim_enable_device(pcidev);
> if (ret) {
>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-25 1:48 [PATCH V2 00/17] Add ACPI-based PMT discovery support for Intel PMC David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 01/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add pre/post decode hooks around header parsing David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 02/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog: Split init into pre-decode David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 03/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt/telemetry: Move overlap check to post-decode hook David E. Box
2026-04-07 11:05 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 04/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Move header decode into common helper David E. Box
2026-04-07 11:05 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 05/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Pass discovery index instead of resource David E. Box
2026-04-07 11:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 06/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Unify header fetch and add ACPI source David E. Box
2026-04-07 12:14 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 07/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add PMC SSRAM Kconfig description David E. Box
2026-04-07 12:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 08/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add ACPI PWRM telemetry driver for Nova Lake S David E. Box
2026-04-07 12:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 09/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Rename probe and PCI ID table for consistency David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 10/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Use fixed-size static pmc array David E. Box
2026-04-07 13:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 11/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Refactor DEVID/PWRMBASE extraction into helper David E. Box
2026-04-07 13:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 12/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Add PCI platform data David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 13/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Refactor memory barrier for reentrant probe David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 14/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry: Fix cleanup pattern for __free() variables David E. Box
2026-04-07 13:33 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 15/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Add ACPI discovery scaffolding David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 16/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Make PMT registration optional David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 17/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add NVL PCI IDs for SSRAM telemetry discovery David E. Box
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43801499-cf67-4606-4b48-10429dd0f76f@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xi.pardee@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox