public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Question] I doublt on spin_lock again.
@ 2005-11-23  2:04 liyu
  2005-11-23  2:51 ` Zhang Le
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: liyu @ 2005-11-23  2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LKML

Hi, All.

    I come here again.

    I have two questions on spin_lock. these are:

    1. I found these use spin_lock(&rq->lock) in set_user_nice(), but 
not disable interrput ( e.g.  when sys_nice() call it ),  if the one 
timer interrput come before we unlock the spin_lock, Shall
we dead lock here?  Since the scheduler_tick() may try to hold the same 
lock.

    2. I also found some function name in its definition have some 
postfix, I show here two classical examples:

static void double_rq_lock(runqueue_t *rq1, runqueue_t *rq2)
    __acquires(rq1->lock)
    __acquires(rq2->lock)
{ ... }

static void double_rq_unlock(runqueue_t *rq1, runqueue_t *rq2)
    __releases(rq1->lock)
    __releases(rq2->lock)
{ ... }

    In the related header files, they are defined as two preprocess 
macroes, are follow:

# define __acquires(x)    __attribute__((context(0,1)))
# define __releases(x)    __attribute__((context(1,0)))
# define __acquire(x)    __context__(1)
# define __release(x)    __context__(-1)


    I guess they are some extensions of gcc for C language, but I did 
not  found any information in GCC manual.

    Would you like reply these questions? Thank advanced.

-liyu










^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-23  4:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-23  2:04 [Question] I doublt on spin_lock again liyu
2005-11-23  2:51 ` Zhang Le
2005-11-23  2:56   ` liyu
2005-11-23  4:09     ` Zhang Le

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox