From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@colitti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Dumitru Ciobarcianu <Dumitru.Ciobarcianu@iNES.RO>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:16:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4384417B.9040201@colitti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051116224728.GI12505@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Yes, hopefully users will not notice.
? So the idea is to merge inferior code and "hope users won't notice"?
Users might not notice that half their memory is gone, but they *will*
notice that their system is dog slow when it resumes because all their
caches are gone and a most of their stuff is swapped out.
Non-responsive system on resume is one of the main reasons that swsusp2
is much better than swsusp1, and yes, users *do* notice (I was one of
them, as I pointed out a while back). Yes, 50% is better than nothing,
but it's still a pretty poor show.
Seen from the perspective of a user, the situation is simple: suspend2
works, it's fast, and it's rock-solid. Just use it.
Regards,
Lorenzo
P.S. Don't "show me the code" me. I can't write the code. :-) But based
on what I see of how well suspend2 works, I think Nigel can...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-23 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-15 21:29 [RFC] userland swsusp Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 21:32 ` [linux-pm] " Greg KH
2005-11-15 22:03 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 22:25 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-15 23:32 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 23:40 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-16 8:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-16 4:35 ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2005-11-16 6:14 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 6:00 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 16:50 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 19:57 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 21:35 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:53 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-23 10:16 ` Lorenzo Colitti [this message]
2005-11-23 12:02 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-19 9:32 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-19 23:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 19:36 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-18 21:18 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-18 21:20 ` Greg KH
2005-11-19 23:43 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-20 21:48 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-20 22:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-21 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-21 14:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 21:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-18 22:07 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-19 4:18 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-11-19 8:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-18 23:34 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 16:10 Gross, Mark
2005-11-16 16:44 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 20:20 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:05 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-16 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 17:02 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 19:57 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:12 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 20:20 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:37 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:59 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:54 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 21:01 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 21:06 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-17 21:14 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 21:18 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-17 21:45 ` Diego Calleja
2005-11-17 21:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-11-17 21:16 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:47 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-16 22:10 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 21:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-17 7:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-16 19:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 16:54 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 16:44 ` Greg KH
2005-11-17 17:03 ` Patrick Mochel
2005-11-17 17:31 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 20:15 ` Jacek Kawa
2005-11-17 21:56 ` Greg KH
2005-11-18 17:41 ` Jacek Kawa
2005-11-18 23:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 18:50 Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4384417B.9040201@colitti.com \
--to=lorenzo@colitti.com \
--cc=Dumitru.Ciobarcianu@iNES.RO \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox