public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@colitti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Dumitru Ciobarcianu <Dumitru.Ciobarcianu@iNES.RO>,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:16:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4384417B.9040201@colitti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051116224728.GI12505@elf.ucw.cz>

Pavel Machek wrote:
> Yes, hopefully users will not notice.

? So the idea is to merge inferior code and "hope users won't notice"?

Users  might not notice that half their memory is gone, but they *will* 
notice that their system is dog slow when it resumes because all their 
caches are gone and a most of their stuff is swapped out.

Non-responsive system on resume is one of the main reasons that swsusp2 
is much better than swsusp1, and yes, users *do* notice (I was one of 
them, as I pointed out a while back). Yes, 50% is better than nothing, 
but it's still a pretty poor show.

Seen from the perspective of a user, the situation is simple: suspend2 
works, it's fast, and it's rock-solid. Just use it.


Regards,
Lorenzo

P.S. Don't "show me the code" me. I can't write the code. :-) But based 
on what I see of how well suspend2 works, I think Nigel can...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-23 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-15 21:29 [RFC] userland swsusp Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 21:32 ` [linux-pm] " Greg KH
2005-11-15 22:03   ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 22:25 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-15 23:32   ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 23:40     ` Dave Jones
2005-11-16  8:56       ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:41       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-16  4:35     ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2005-11-16  6:14       ` Greg KH
2005-11-16  6:00         ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 16:50           ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 19:57             ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 21:35               ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:13                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:47                   ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:53                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-23 10:16                     ` Lorenzo Colitti [this message]
2005-11-23 12:02                       ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-19  9:32           ` Rob Landley
2005-11-19 23:51             ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 19:36   ` Alan Cox
2005-11-18 21:18     ` Dave Jones
2005-11-18 21:20       ` Greg KH
2005-11-19 23:43       ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-20 21:48         ` Dave Jones
2005-11-20 22:09           ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-21 11:47             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-21 14:19               ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 21:23     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-18 22:07       ` Alan Cox
2005-11-19  4:18         ` Jesse Barnes
2005-11-19  8:44         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-18 23:34     ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 16:10 Gross, Mark
2005-11-16 16:44 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 20:20   ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:05     ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:13       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:41         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-16 22:50         ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 17:02       ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 19:57         ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:12           ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 20:20             ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:37               ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:46                 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:59                   ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:54                 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 21:01                   ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 21:06                   ` Chris Wright
2005-11-17 21:14                     ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 21:18                       ` Chris Wright
2005-11-17 21:45                         ` Diego Calleja
2005-11-17 21:09                 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-11-17 21:16                   ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:47             ` Lee Revell
2005-11-16 22:10     ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 21:25       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-17  7:14         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-16 19:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 16:54   ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 16:44     ` Greg KH
2005-11-17 17:03       ` Patrick Mochel
2005-11-17 17:31       ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 20:15       ` Jacek Kawa
2005-11-17 21:56         ` Greg KH
2005-11-18 17:41           ` Jacek Kawa
2005-11-18 23:22     ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 18:50 Starikovskiy, Alexey Y

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4384417B.9040201@colitti.com \
    --to=lorenzo@colitti.com \
    --cc=Dumitru.Ciobarcianu@iNES.RO \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox