From: Chris Ross <lak1646@tebibyte.org>
To: Chris Ross <lak1646@tebibyte.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic reading bad disk sector
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:51:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <438465CC.6070904@tebibyte.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <438443E8.5040602@tebibyte.org>
Chris Ross escreveu:
> Russell King - ARM Linux escreveu:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 09:25:40AM +0000, Chris Ross wrote:
>>> Greg Ungerer escreveu:
>>>> Chris Ross wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> According System.map it is in the function ide_dma_timeout_retry.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, that is good information. I would try and figure out which
>>>> line of code in there is dereferencing a NULL pointer.
>>>
>>> It would seem to be this line
>>>
>>> rq->errors = 0;
>
> because rq is set to NULL by earlier the line
>
> ret = DRIVER(drive)->error(drive, "dma timeout retry",
> hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG));
Which looks like the the correct thing to do. In idedisk_error once the
threshold for the maximum number of retries has been reached the request
is ended because it cannot be serviced
if (rq->errors >= ERROR_MAX)
DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 0);
in idedisk_end_request the request is explicitly set to NULL because it
is now ended, in the code block...
if (!end_that_request_first(rq, uptodate, drive->name)) {
add_blkdev_randomness(MAJOR(rq->rq_dev));
blkdev_dequeue_request(rq);
HWGROUP(drive)->rq = NULL;
end_that_request_last(rq);
ret = 0;
}
Which means that ide_dma_timeout_retry should take account of the fact
that the request might no longer be valid before using it.
In other words it should be...
/* Check whether the request ended early due to disk errors */
if( rq ) {
rq->errors = 0;
rq->sector = rq->bh->b_rsector;
rq->current_nr_sectors = rq->bh->b_size >> 9;
rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors;
rq->buffer = rq->bh->b_data;
}
If anyone has a better solution I would be glad to hear it. Failing that
I'll submit this in normal kernel patch format as soon as I've worked
out how...
Regards,
Chris R.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-23 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4381DA23.10201@tebibyte.org>
[not found] ` <4382B815.5000701@snapgear.com>
[not found] ` <43836758.6050001@tebibyte.org>
[not found] ` <4383C205.7020608@snapgear.com>
[not found] ` <43843594.9050009@tebibyte.org>
[not found] ` <20051123095640.GA5022@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-11-23 10:26 ` Kernel panic reading bad disk sector Chris Ross
2005-11-23 10:48 ` Chris Ross
2005-11-23 12:51 ` Chris Ross [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=438465CC.6070904@tebibyte.org \
--to=lak1646@tebibyte.org \
--cc=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox