public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>,
	Luvella McFadden <luvella@us.ibm.com>,
	AJ Johnson <blujuice@us.ibm.com>,
	Kevin Stansell <kstansel@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic79xx should be able to ignore HostRAID enabled adapters
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:22:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <438EB2D3.6030605@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <438E9B24.9020806@pobox.com>

Jeff,

Good, this was the exact response that I was hoping for, as I've been told to
convince Adaptec to drop the binary RAID drivers in favor of helping out dmraid
development instead.  That process will probably be difficult, but at least I
now have incontrovertible proof that nobody will bend over backwards to support
them and that dmraid is the way to go.  Not that I'm terribly surprised by this.

I would, however, like to apologize for all this churlishness.  Hopefully some
day I won't have to deal with these binary modules altogether, and I won't have
to resort to such methods to get vendors to Do the Right Thing(tm).

--D

(A pity that dmraid doesn't do hostraid right now, otherwise none of this would
be necessary.)

Jeff Garzik wrote:

> This is the correct behavior.  Under Linux, the driver should export
> only the underlying hardware, and nothing more.  This is how all the
> SATA controller drivers function, and this is how aic79xx functions.
> 
> Use a tool such as 'dmraid' for vendor-proprietary RAID solutions.
> 
> Your patch is therefore strongly NAK'd.
> 
>     Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-01  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-01  5:57 [PATCH] aic79xx should be able to ignore HostRAID enabled adapters Darrick J. Wong
2005-12-01  6:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-01  8:22   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2005-12-01  8:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-01 11:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-01 13:44 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-12-01 14:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-01 14:47 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2005-12-03 11:22   ` Matthias Andree
2005-12-03 16:19     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-03 16:39       ` Matthias Andree
2005-12-01 17:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-01 17:56   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-01 17:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-02 19:06 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-01 18:46 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-12-01 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 21:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2005-12-05 21:25     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-06  9:14     ` Heinz Mauelshagen
     [not found] <5ePEj-2gB-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <5eQqA-3pv-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <5eRZp-5KA-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-12-02  0:38     ` Robert Hancock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=438EB2D3.6030605@us.ibm.com \
    --to=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=blujuice@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=kstansel@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luvella@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox