* discrepency between "df" and "du" on tmpfs filesystem?
@ 2005-12-01 15:32 Christopher Friesen
2005-12-01 16:41 ` Hugh Dickins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Friesen @ 2005-12-01 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Someone noticed this on one of our machines. The rootfs is a 256MB
tmpfs filesystem. Depending on how you check the size, you get two
different answers.
root@10.41.50.66:/root> df -hl
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rootfs 256M 250M 6.4M 98% /
none 32M 116K 32M 1% /tmp
root@10.41.50.66:/root> df -kl
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
rootfs 262144 255684 6460 98% /
none 32768 116 32652 1% /tmp
root@10.41.50.66:/root> du -sxk /
204672 /
root@10.41.50.66:/root> du -sxh /
200M /
Anyone know what's going on?
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: discrepency between "df" and "du" on tmpfs filesystem?
2005-12-01 15:32 discrepency between "df" and "du" on tmpfs filesystem? Christopher Friesen
@ 2005-12-01 16:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-01 17:44 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2005-12-01 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Friesen; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Christopher Friesen wrote:
>
> Someone noticed this on one of our machines. The rootfs is a 256MB tmpfs
> filesystem. Depending on how you check the size, you get two different
> answers.
>
> root@10.41.50.66:/root> df -kl
> rootfs 262144 255684 6460 98% /
>
> root@10.41.50.66:/root> du -sxk /
> 204672 /
>
> Anyone know what's going on?
df tells you what the filesystem says is in use or free, via statfs.
du goes looking at the contents of the filesystem, totalling stats.
Any files unlinked but held open will be counted by df but not by du.
There might also be a discrepancy over indirect blocks, I'm not sure.
Hugh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: discrepency between "df" and "du" on tmpfs filesystem?
2005-12-01 16:41 ` Hugh Dickins
@ 2005-12-01 17:44 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2005-12-01 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hugh Dickins; +Cc: Christopher Friesen, linux-kernel
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> writes:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Christopher Friesen wrote:
>>
>> Someone noticed this on one of our machines. The rootfs is a 256MB tmpfs
>> filesystem. Depending on how you check the size, you get two different
>> answers.
>>
>> root@10.41.50.66:/root> df -kl
>> rootfs 262144 255684 6460 98% /
>>
>> root@10.41.50.66:/root> du -sxk /
>> 204672 /
>>
>> Anyone know what's going on?
>
> df tells you what the filesystem says is in use or free, via statfs.
> du goes looking at the contents of the filesystem, totalling stats.
> Any files unlinked but held open will be counted by df but not by du.
> There might also be a discrepancy over indirect blocks, I'm not sure.
Also an empty filesystem usually does not have zero use, since the
filesystem overhead (inode table, etc) may be accounted in the statfs
counts.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-12-01 17:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-01 15:32 discrepency between "df" and "du" on tmpfs filesystem? Christopher Friesen
2005-12-01 16:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-01 17:44 ` Andreas Schwab
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox