From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic79xx should be able to ignore HostRAID enabled adapters
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:38:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <438F9790.9060801@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5eRZp-5KA-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> Good, this was the exact response that I was hoping for, as I've been told to
> convince Adaptec to drop the binary RAID drivers in favor of helping out dmraid
> development instead. That process will probably be difficult, but at least I
> now have incontrovertible proof that nobody will bend over backwards to support
> them and that dmraid is the way to go. Not that I'm terribly surprised by this.
It's good that there is a push to get non-binary-module support for
these controllers in Linux. It's a shame that this is only happening now
though.
It does rather suck that IBM changed to use this AIC79xx controller with
"HostRAID" in the x346, x236, etc. servers. The last generation of
servers (x235, x345) used an LSI Logic MPT Fusion controller which could
do RAID 1 in hardware (or at least firmware) without a special driver -
this sufficed for certain applications. With the new machines, RAID on
the onboard controller requires using the stupid binary module which is
only built against certain specific kernels, or using pure software RAID..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-02 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5ePEj-2gB-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5eQqA-3pv-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5eRZp-5KA-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-12-02 0:38 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2005-12-01 18:46 [PATCH] aic79xx should be able to ignore HostRAID enabled adapters Salyzyn, Mark
2005-12-01 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 21:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2005-12-05 21:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-06 9:14 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-01 13:44 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-12-01 14:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-01 14:47 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2005-12-03 11:22 ` Matthias Andree
2005-12-03 16:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-03 16:39 ` Matthias Andree
2005-12-01 17:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-01 17:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-01 17:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-02 19:06 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-01 5:57 Darrick J. Wong
2005-12-01 6:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-01 8:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2005-12-01 8:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-01 11:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=438F9790.9060801@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox