public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic79xx should be able to ignore HostRAID enabled adapters
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:38:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <438F9790.9060801@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5eRZp-5KA-7@gated-at.bofh.it>

Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> Good, this was the exact response that I was hoping for, as I've been told to
> convince Adaptec to drop the binary RAID drivers in favor of helping out dmraid
> development instead.  That process will probably be difficult, but at least I
> now have incontrovertible proof that nobody will bend over backwards to support
> them and that dmraid is the way to go.  Not that I'm terribly surprised by this.

It's good that there is a push to get non-binary-module support for 
these controllers in Linux. It's a shame that this is only happening now 
though.

It does rather suck that IBM changed to use this AIC79xx controller with 
"HostRAID" in the x346, x236, etc. servers. The last generation of 
servers (x235, x345) used an LSI Logic MPT Fusion controller which could 
do RAID 1 in hardware (or at least firmware) without a special driver - 
this sufficed for certain applications. With the new machines, RAID on 
the onboard controller requires using the stupid binary module which is 
only built against certain specific kernels, or using pure software RAID..

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/


       reply	other threads:[~2005-12-02  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5ePEj-2gB-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <5eQqA-3pv-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <5eRZp-5KA-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-12-02  0:38     ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2005-12-01 18:46 [PATCH] aic79xx should be able to ignore HostRAID enabled adapters Salyzyn, Mark
2005-12-01 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 21:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2005-12-05 21:25     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-06  9:14     ` Heinz Mauelshagen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-01 13:44 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-12-01 14:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-01 14:47 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2005-12-03 11:22   ` Matthias Andree
2005-12-03 16:19     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-03 16:39       ` Matthias Andree
2005-12-01 17:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-01 17:56   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-01 17:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-02 19:06 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-01  5:57 Darrick J. Wong
2005-12-01  6:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-01  8:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2005-12-01  8:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-01 11:26 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=438F9790.9060801@shaw.ca \
    --to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox