Re: [PATCHv2] cpumask: work around false-postive stringop-overread errors

Greg KH
2024-12-08T13:29:14Z

On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 03:51:10PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>
>
> On 12/7/24 17:14, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 12:43:19PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 06:04:09PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> >>> While building the powerpc code using gcc 13, I came across following
> >>> errors generated for kernel/padata.c file:
> >>>
> >>> CC kernel/padata.o
> >>> In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:390,
> >>> from ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h:16,
> >>> from ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/current.h:13,
> >>> from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:23,
> >>> from ./include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5,
> >>> from ./arch/powerpc/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1,
> >>> from ./include/linux/preempt.h:79,
> >>> from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
> >>> from ./include/linux/swait.h:7,
> >>> from ./include/linux/completion.h:12,
> >>> from kernel/padata.c:14:
> >>> In function ‘bitmap_copy’,
> >>> inlined from ‘cpumask_copy’ at ./include/linux/cpumask.h:839:2,
> >>> inlined from ‘__padata_set_cpumasks’ at kernel/padata.c:730:2:
> >>> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:114:33: error: ‘__builtin_memcpy’ reading between 257 and 536870904 bytes from a region of size 256 [-Werror=stringop-overread]
> >>> 114 | #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
> >>> | ^
> >>> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:633:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__underlying_memcpy’
> >>> 633 | __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size); \
> >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:678:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘__fortify_memcpy_chk’
> >>> 678 | #define memcpy(p, q, s) __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s, \
> >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>> ./include/linux/bitmap.h:259:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘memcpy’
> >>> 259 | memcpy(dst, src, len);
> >>> | ^~~~~~
> >>> kernel/padata.c: In function ‘__padata_set_cpumasks’:
> >>> kernel/padata.c:713:48: note: source object ‘pcpumask’ of size [0, 256]
> >>> 713 | cpumask_var_t pcpumask,
> >>> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
> >>> In function ‘bitmap_copy’,
> >>> inlined from ‘cpumask_copy’ at ./include/linux/cpumask.h:839:2,
> >>> inlined from ‘__padata_set_cpumasks’ at kernel/padata.c:730:2:
> >>> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:114:33: error: ‘__builtin_memcpy’ reading between 257 and 536870904 bytes from a region of size 256 [-Werror=stringop-overread]
> >>> 114 | #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
> >>> | ^
> >>> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:633:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__underlying_memcpy’
> >>> 633 | __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size); \
> >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:678:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘__fortify_memcpy_chk’
> >>> 678 | #define memcpy(p, q, s) __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s, \
> >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>> ./include/linux/bitmap.h:259:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘memcpy’
> >>> 259 | memcpy(dst, src, len);
> >>> | ^~~~~~
> >>> kernel/padata.c: In function ‘__padata_set_cpumasks’:
> >>> kernel/padata.c:713:48: note: source object ‘pcpumask’ of size [0, 256]
> >>> 713 | cpumask_var_t pcpumask,
> >>> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
> >>>
> >>> Apparently, above errors only manifests with GCC 13.x and config option
> >>> CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE. Furthermore, if I use gcc 11.x or gcc 12.x then I
> >>> don't encounter above errors. Prima facie, these errors appear to be false-
> >>> positive. Brian informed me that currently some efforts are underway by
> >>> GCC developers to emit more verbose information when GCC detects string
> >>> overflow errors and that might help to further narrow down the root cause
> >>> of this error. So for now, silence these errors using -Wno-stringop-
> >>> overread gcc option while building kernel/padata.c file until we find the
> >>> root cause.
> >>
> >> I'm hitting this now on Linus's tree using gcc14 on x86-64 so this isn't
> >> just a problem with your arch.
> Thanks Greg for confirming that this is not isolated to PowerPC!!
> >>
> >> Let me try this patch locally and see if it helps...
> >
> > Yes, fixes the build for me, so either this is a real fix, or something
> > else needs to be done for it, so I'll give a:
> >
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> > for now.
> Okay so now we've an evidence confirming that this is no longer PowerPC specific
> issue. Hence as Yury suggested, in another mail[1], fixing this error by disabling
> stringop-overread globally for GCC13+ and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=n, I will spin a
> new patch and submit it.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z1HTdtvNjm-nZSvJ@yury-ThinkPad/

That feels wrong, unless this is a compiler bug. And if it's a compiler
bug, can we fix the compiler please or at least submit a bug to the gcc
developers?

I'm slowly moving all my boxes/builds over to using clang to build the
kernel due to rust kernel work, so I guess I can do that here as well as
I don't think this issue shows up for that compiler, right?

thanks,

greg k-h