From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 22:50:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43950A99.5040907@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051206014720.GN22168@hexapodia.org>
Andy Isaacson wrote:
>
>>/dev/hda:
>> Timing buffered disk reads: 108 MB in 3.01 seconds = 35.85 MB/sec
>
> That's quite a bit better than mine, and I am pretty sure I am the same
> vintage or newer (purchased this summer), but I'm getting barely half
> that speed:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 58 MB in 3.10 seconds = 18.70 MB/sec
>
> How can I find out what disk is in this beast and try to track down some
> of my missing performance?
hdparm -I /dev/hda (or cat /proc/ide/hda/model)
The FUJITSU MHV2100AH in my Dell i9300 gives 57.5 MB/sec with hdparm.
Note that hdparm does not read in the most efficient manner
(so the drive is likely even faster than that),
and writing to drives is normally slower than reading.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-06 3:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-05 8:19 swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Andy Isaacson
2005-12-05 12:17 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 13:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-05 17:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 21:11 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-05 23:34 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:26 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 1:52 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06 0:01 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06 1:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 1:37 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:47 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 1:56 ` IDE performance on notebooks [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1] Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 6:23 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 11:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:57 ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 3:50 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2005-12-06 15:03 ` Mark Lord
2005-12-06 2:02 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 12:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 2:06 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 2:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 14:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 22:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-07 22:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 2:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 12:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 18:15 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-07 1:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 1:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 11:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 11:30 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-08 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-08 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 21:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-05 23:55 ` swsusp: how much memory to free? [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1] Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 11:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 11:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 12:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 12:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 23:05 ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06 0:12 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 0:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-10 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-10 23:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-10 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-11 12:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-11 23:28 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-12 17:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43950A99.5040907@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox