From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932225AbVLGEMW (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:12:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750999AbVLGEMW (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:12:22 -0500 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:64923 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750887AbVLGEMV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:12:21 -0500 Message-ID: <43966117.9040700@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:12:07 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86 PCI domain support References: <20051203013904.GA2560@havoc.gtf.org> <20051203031533.GB14247@wotan.suse.de> <4391FC0A.9040202@pobox.com> <20051207003922.GA18528@kroah.com> <43964586.3080300@pobox.com> <20051207023305.GA19746@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20051207023305.GA19746@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "srv2.dvmed.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:14:30PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Greg KH wrote: >> >>>On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 03:11:54PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> >>> >>>>The first two patches could go in immediately, the last should probably >>>>wait a bit... >>> >>> >>>What is the rush? These seem pretty late for the -rc series :) >>> >>>I'll send them in after 2.6.15 is out, is that ok? >> >>You were supposed to read my mind :) "immediately" meant "ok for >>upstream when -rc cycle closes" :) The third patch I don't consider >>ready for upstream, -rc or no. > > > Ok, thanks. But I did just include the third patch in my tree, so it > will get tested in -mm. If you don't want this to happen, just let me > know and I'll drop it. [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [69.134.188.146 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:14:30PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Greg KH wrote: >> >>>On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 03:11:54PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> >>> >>>>The first two patches could go in immediately, the last should probably >>>>wait a bit... >>> >>> >>>What is the rush? These seem pretty late for the -rc series :) >>> >>>I'll send them in after 2.6.15 is out, is that ok? >> >>You were supposed to read my mind :) "immediately" meant "ok for >>upstream when -rc cycle closes" :) The third patch I don't consider >>ready for upstream, -rc or no. > > > Ok, thanks. But I did just include the third patch in my tree, so it > will get tested in -mm. If you don't want this to happen, just let me > know and I'll drop it. There's no ultimate harm in it, because nothing turns on CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS in x86[-64] yet... Jeff