Re: [Lhms-devel] Re: [PATCH] swap migration: Fix lru drain

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> 
>>I'll change this to return 0 on success, or -ENOMEM.  Bit more
>>conventional, no?
> 
> 
> Ok. That also allows the addition of other error conditions in the future.
> Need to revise isolate_lru_page to reflect that.
> 
This patch was needed to compile.

-- Kame
==
Index: hotremove-2.6.15-rc5-mm1/include/linux/workqueue.h
===================================================================
--- hotremove-2.6.15-rc5-mm1.orig/include/linux/workqueue.h	2005-12-08 17:32:18.000000000 +0900
+++ hotremove-2.6.15-rc5-mm1/include/linux/workqueue.h	2005-12-08 17:32:43.000000000 +0900
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
  extern int FASTCALL(schedule_delayed_work(struct work_struct *work, unsigned long delay));

  extern int schedule_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct work_struct *work, unsigned long delay);
-extern void schedule_on_each_cpu(void (*func)(void *info), void *info);
+extern int schedule_on_each_cpu(void (*func)(void *info), void *info);
  extern void flush_scheduled_work(void);
  extern int current_is_keventd(void);
  extern int keventd_up(void);