From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
dada1@cosmobay.com
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:22:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43A127D3.1070106@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051215023748.GD3787@localhost.localdomain>
Ravikiran G Thirumalai a écrit :
> Patch uses a static PDA array early at boot and reallocates processor PDA
> with node local memory when kmalloc is ready, just before pda_init.
> The boot_cpu_pda is needed since the cpu_pda is used even before pda_init for
> that cpu is called.
> (pda_init is called when APs are brought on at rest_init(). But
> setup_per_cpu_areas is called early in start_kernel and
> sched_init uses the per-cpu offset table early)
That seems good, thank you !
Do you have an idea of the performance gain we could expect from this node
local pda allocation ?
Say a CPU is on Node 1, was a change in pda (allocated on Node 0) immediatly
mirrored on remote node or not ?
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-15 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-15 2:33 [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- early cpu_to_node Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-15 2:35 ` [patch 2/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- cpu_pda_prep Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-15 2:37 ` [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-15 8:22 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2005-12-15 9:36 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-15 9:42 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-12-15 18:47 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-16 0:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-16 3:55 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-15 9:44 ` [discuss] [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- early cpu_to_node Andi Kleen
2005-12-15 19:01 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-16 0:20 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-16 8:11 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43A127D3.1070106@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmobay.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox