From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751029AbVLTTkV (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:40:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751046AbVLTTkU (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:40:20 -0500 Received: from relay10.CS.McGill.CA ([132.206.3.88]:4101 "EHLO relay10.cs.mcgill.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751029AbVLTTkS (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:40:18 -0500 Message-ID: <43A85E16.2030908@cs.ubishops.ca> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:40:06 -0500 From: Patrick McLean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051205) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Light-weight dynamically extended stacks References: <20051219001249.GD11856@waste.org> <20051219183604.GT23349@stusta.de> <20051220002759.GE3356@waste.org> <20051220164316.GG6789@stusta.de> <20051220183025.GG3356@waste.org> In-Reply-To: <20051220183025.GG3356@waste.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matt Mackall wrote: > > This is not intended to be an automatic scheme. To use it, you must > actually insert code into the troublesome codepaths, which will of > course serve as a red flag for code review. > It might be an idea to put in a #warn to make it an even bigger red flag, and to really make people fix this rather than just ignore it since it works with the dynamic stacks.