Re: [PATCH/RFC] SPI core: turn transfers to be linked list

[Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>]

David Brownell wrote:

>>And in case transfers is an array, we should either be apriory  
>>aware of whether the chaining will take place or allocate an array large 
>>enough to hold additional transfers. Neither of these look good to me, 
>>and having a linked list of transfers will definitely solve this problem.
>>    
>>
>
>Well, that's the guts of the good example I was hoping you would share.
>I'll be posting a refresh of this code soonish; maybe you can provide 
>a complete patch, changing all the code over to use list-not-array?
>  
>
Let's agree upon that I'll proovide the complete patch as soon as you 
repost all the patches from the very beginning (with the updates you've 
made).
It's a little bit hard to track all that stuff now, I mean patches, 
patches to patches, etc. :)

Vitaly