From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: gmack@innerfire.net
Subject: Re: software raid 5 broken on 2.6.14.4 sparc
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:51:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43B43020.8080804@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5paRd-18Z-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
Gerhard Mack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had one of 5 drives fail in my raid 5 setup and now many files are
> unreadable.. Isn't raid 5 supposed to compensate for exactly this
> happening?
It looks like you have multiple drives with problems here:
Here's sde unhappy:
> Dec 25 18:36:27 localhost kernel: sde: Current: sense key: Recovered Error
> Dec 25 18:36:27 localhost kernel: Additional sense: Recovered data - recommend reassignment
sdb seems to be overheating:
> Dec 26 11:25:56 localhost kernel: sdb: Current: sense key: Recovered Error
> Dec 26 11:25:56 localhost kernel: Additional sense: Warning - specified temperature exceeded
Now sdf is unhappy..
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: sdf: Current: sense key: Hardware Error
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: Additional sense: Mechanical positioning error
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdf, sector 9664
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: raid5: Disk failure on sdf, disabling device. Operation continuing on 4 devices
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: RAID5 conf printout:
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: --- rd:6 wd:4 fd:2
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: disk 0, o:1, dev:sdc
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: disk 1, o:1, dev:sdd
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: disk 2, o:1, dev:sde
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: disk 3, o:0, dev:sdf
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: disk 4, o:1, dev:sdg
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: RAID5 conf printout:
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: --- rd:6 wd:4 fd:2
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: disk 0, o:1, dev:sdc
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: disk 1, o:1, dev:sdd
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: disk 2, o:1, dev:sde
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: disk 4, o:1, dev:sdg
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: Buffer I/O error on device md0, logical block 6040
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on md0
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: REISERFS: abort (device md0): Journal write error in flush_commit_list
> Dec 29 06:26:07 localhost kernel: REISERFS: Aborting journal for filesystem on md0
> Dec 29 07:16:56 localhost kernel: ReiserFS: md0: warning: clm-6006: writing inode 2996 on readonly FS
> Dec 29 07:16:56 localhost kernel: ReiserFS: md0: warning: clm-6006: writing inode 2996 on readonly FS
> Dec 29 07:17:28 localhost kernel: Buffer I/O error on device md0, logical block 5052984
> Dec 29 07:17:28 localhost kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on md0
I don't know if this completely explains the failure, but it seems you
have bigger problems than one bad drive, and RAID5 cannot handle
multiple drive failures.
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-29 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5paRd-18Z-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-12-29 18:51 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2005-12-29 19:11 ` [solved][Re: software raid 5 broken on 2.6.14.4 sparc Gerhard Mack
2005-12-29 18:34 Gerhard Mack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43B43020.8080804@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=gmack@innerfire.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox