* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems [not found] ` <5qAKf-7n4-19@gated-at.bofh.it> @ 2006-01-02 19:18 ` Robert Hancock 2006-01-02 19:53 ` Andi Kleen [not found] ` <5qBcJ-7ZZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Hancock @ 2006-01-02 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: ak Andi Kleen wrote: > When you not compile in the SKGE network driver does everything else work? > skge supports 64bit DMA, so it shouldn't use any IOMMU. Are you sure this is skge? Anyway, even if the driver does support 64-bit DMA, I would be surprised if a desktop motherboard had the Ethernet chip connected via a 64-bit PCI bus. This brings up something I've been wondering. It's possible to run most 64-bit capable PCI devices in a 32-bit slot (i.e. with the 64-bit part hanging out of the slot). In this configuration the device will not be able to use 64-bit DMA (unless it supports dual address cycle). However, who is supposed to detect this and know to not try to use DMA addresses above 4GB on that device? Is the driver supposed to know this and use a 32-bit DMA mask, or is the PCI subsystem able to figure this out somehow? What if the driver has no way to detect this? I don't think I've seen any code in the kernel that would figure out if the current configuration of the card is actually capable of 64-bit DMA or not. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-02 19:18 ` X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems Robert Hancock @ 2006-01-02 19:53 ` Andi Kleen 2006-01-02 20:15 ` Robert Hancock 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-02 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Hancock; +Cc: linux-kernel On Monday 02 January 2006 20:18, Robert Hancock wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > When you not compile in the SKGE network driver does everything else work? > > skge supports 64bit DMA, so it shouldn't use any IOMMU. > > Are you sure this is skge? I grepped for the output in that badly truncated logfile and skge hit. > Anyway, even if the driver does support > 64-bit DMA, I would be surprised if a desktop motherboard had the > Ethernet chip connected via a 64-bit PCI bus. I meant 64bit DMA, aka double address cycle, not a 64bit wide PCI-X bus. That works on a 32bit PCI bus too. On modern boards it's likely PCI Express anyways for on board devices. > > This brings up something I've been wondering. It's possible to run most > 64-bit capable PCI devices in a 32-bit slot (i.e. with the 64-bit part > hanging out of the slot). In this configuration the device will not be > able to use 64-bit DMA (unless it supports dual address cycle). However, > who is supposed to detect this and know to not try to use DMA addresses > above 4GB on that device? 64bit PCI-X bus has nothing to do with the addressing capability. It just gives you more bandwidth. -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-02 19:53 ` Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-02 20:15 ` Robert Hancock 2006-01-02 20:39 ` Andi Kleen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Hancock @ 2006-01-02 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel Andi Kleen wrote: >>This brings up something I've been wondering. It's possible to run most >>64-bit capable PCI devices in a 32-bit slot (i.e. with the 64-bit part >>hanging out of the slot). In this configuration the device will not be >>able to use 64-bit DMA (unless it supports dual address cycle). However, >>who is supposed to detect this and know to not try to use DMA addresses >>above 4GB on that device? > > > 64bit PCI-X bus has nothing to do with the addressing capability. It > just gives you more bandwidth. Indeed, I misunderstood how this worked.. Accesses to addresses >4GB must always use DAC addressing, the address can just be decoded faster if the extra 64-bit data lines are connected. I think there could still be an issue if the PCI bus does not support DAC and the device tries to use PCI DAC addressing causing the bus to choke or the wrong RAM to get accessed. Apparently this is a real problem according to MS: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx "Unfortunately, Microsoft is finding that not all PCI buses on a system board support DAC, which is required for a 32-bit PCI adapter to address more than 4 GB of memory. Furthermore, there is no way for a DAC-capable PCI device (or its associated driver) to know that it is running on a non-DAC-capable bus." Microsoft's solution is to disable all memory above 4GB if non-DAC-capable buses are present - largely due to their API limitations and the number of broken drivers that don't call proper DMA functions. Haha to them, I guess.. I'm not sure if this would be an issue with Linux. I would suspect that it could be, if there are indeed such buses that can't support DAC.. In this case the right thing to do would be to reject requests for DMA masks larger than 4GB for devices located on such a bus. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-02 20:15 ` Robert Hancock @ 2006-01-02 20:39 ` Andi Kleen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-02 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Hancock; +Cc: linux-kernel On Monday 02 January 2006 21:15, Robert Hancock wrote: > I'm not sure if this would be an issue with Linux. I would suspect that > it could be, if there are indeed such buses that can't support DAC.. In > this case the right thing to do would be to reject requests for DMA > masks larger than 4GB for devices located on such a bus. Well, from the original messages in this thread which you so shamelessly hijacked it is possible VIA PCI bridges might have this problem. If yes it can be handled in the PCI-DMA API by disallowing DAC for devices behind such bridges. But before taking such drastic action we need first need more testing results. -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <5qBcJ-7ZZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>]
[parent not found: <5qDez-2Qf-19@gated-at.bofh.it>]
[parent not found: <5r2nz-63n-233@gated-at.bofh.it>]
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems [not found] ` <5r2nz-63n-233@gated-at.bofh.it> @ 2006-01-04 3:03 ` Robert Hancock 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Hancock @ 2006-01-04 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Carsten Otto wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:01:08PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > >>Alternatively you can try with the appended patch. If that helps >>then the chipset or the BIOS likely has some fundamental issue with >4GB. > > > Based on the first few minutes of testing this works perfectly! Thanks a > lot! > > PS: Does it make sense to contact my shop and/or Abit and/or VIA > regarding this problem? I don't want to pay money for broken hardware. I suspect VIA may be the best place to complain to, it is most likely their breakage. I don't know how responsive they are to such things however. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems
@ 2006-01-02 11:09 Dieter Stüken
2006-01-02 12:26 ` Carsten Otto
2006-01-02 16:22 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-02 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
just gave 2.6.15-rc7 a try, but still fail when plugging 4g into the board :-(
Its an Asus sk8v (VIA chipset), thus I get:
Linux version 2.6.15-rc7 (root@linux2) (gcc version 3.3.5 20050117 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #9 Sun Jan 1 19:54:26 CET 2006
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000000e4000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000bff30000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 00000000bff30000 - 00000000bff40000 (ACPI data)
BIOS-e820: 00000000bff40000 - 00000000bfff0000 (ACPI NVS)
BIOS-e820: 00000000bfff0000 - 00000000c0000000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000fff80000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 0000000140000000 (usable)
ACPI: RSDP (v002 ACPIAM ) @ 0x00000000000fa850
ACPI: XSDT (v001 A M I OEMXSDT 0x06000517 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x00000000bff30100
ACPI: FADT (v003 A M I OEMFACP 0x06000517 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x00000000bff30290
ACPI: MADT (v001 A M I OEMAPIC 0x06000517 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x00000000bff30390
ACPI: OEMB (v001 A M I OEMBIOS 0x06000517 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x00000000bff40040
ACPI: DSDT (v001 SK8V_ SK8V_033 0x00000033 MSFT 0x0100000d) @ 0x0000000000000000
On node 0 totalpages: 1029568
DMA zone: 3160 pages, LIFO batch:0
DMA32 zone: 767848 pages, LIFO batch:31
Normal zone: 258560 pages, LIFO batch:31
HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:0
Looks like a VIA chipset. Disabling IOMMU. Overwrite with "iommu=allowed"
.....
GSI 19 sharing vector 0xC1 and IRQ 19
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0a.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0a.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
eth0: 3Com Gigabit LOM (3C940)
PrefPort:A RlmtMode:Check Link State
don't know, if it's related to that, but with 2G it runs stable since about a year.
The problem arises as soon as my network (3C940) gets enabled, the following
message is continuously repeated and nothing else works any more, not even
console switching.
eth0: -- ERROR --
Class: Hardware failure
Nr: 0x264
Msg: unexpected IRQ Status error
eth0: Adapter failed.
Any suggestion? Try different boot options acpi= pci= iommu= ... ?
Dieter.
--
Dieter Stüken, con terra GmbH, Münster
stueken@conterra.de
http://www.conterra.de/
(0)251-7474-501
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-02 11:09 Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-02 12:26 ` Carsten Otto 2006-01-02 16:22 ` Andi Kleen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Carsten Otto @ 2006-01-02 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel I did not read (and find) your original posting, but it appears to me that your problem is similar to mine. I upgraded to 4GB RAM on X86_64 and after that my Intel Gigabit card stopped working. http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/19/144 Perhaps the higher class Gigabit cards need some memory area that is (once) overwritten with 4GB main memory? I have no clue, actually :) > eth0: 3Com Gigabit LOM (3C940) > PrefPort:A RlmtMode:Check Link State Did you try the ethtool tests? They show more information, at least with my card. > don't know, if it's related to that, but with 2G it runs stable since about > a year. Does the problem still occur with 2GB (less)? Did you try running Knoppix? The latter solves the problem here, but obviously Knoppix is no final solution. > The problem arises as soon as my network (3C940) gets enabled, the following > message is continuously repeated and nothing else works any more, not even > console switching. Wow. -- Carsten Otto c-otto@gmx.de www.c-otto.de ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-02 11:09 Dieter Stüken 2006-01-02 12:26 ` Carsten Otto @ 2006-01-02 16:22 ` Andi Kleen 2006-01-02 16:52 ` Carsten Otto 2006-01-03 10:04 ` Dieter Stüken 1 sibling, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-02 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dieter Stüken; +Cc: linux-kernel, discuss Dieter Stüken <stueken@conterra.de> writes: > just gave 2.6.15-rc7 a try, but still fail when plugging 4g into the board :-( > Its an Asus sk8v (VIA chipset), thus I get: Can you please post the full boot log? > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0a.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0a.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 > eth0: 3Com Gigabit LOM (3C940) > PrefPort:A RlmtMode:Check Link State > > don't know, if it's related to that, but with 2G it runs stable since about a year. > > The problem arises as soon as my network (3C940) gets enabled, the following > message is continuously repeated and nothing else works any more, not even > console switching. When you not compile in the SKGE network driver does everything else work? skge supports 64bit DMA, so it shouldn't use any IOMMU. But I'm somewhat suspicious of the >4GB support in the VIA chipset. We had problems with that before. It's possible that it's just not supported in the hardware or that the BIOS sets up the MTRRs wrong. -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-02 16:22 ` Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-02 16:52 ` Carsten Otto 2006-01-02 17:46 ` Carsten Otto 2006-01-02 19:01 ` Andi Kleen 2006-01-03 10:04 ` Dieter Stüken 1 sibling, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Carsten Otto @ 2006-01-02 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 632 bytes --] On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:22:12PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > When you not compile in the SKGE network driver does everything else work? > skge supports 64bit DMA, so it shouldn't use any IOMMU. But I'm somewhat > suspicious of the >4GB support in the VIA chipset. We had problems with > that before. It's possible that it's just not supported in the hardware > or that the BIOS sets up the MTRRs wrong. How can I find that out? Can I provide any useful material? VIA KT800Pro and 4GB RAM here.. PS: I am not the original poster, but have a similar problem. Thanks, -- Carsten Otto c-otto@gmx.de www.c-otto.de [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-02 16:52 ` Carsten Otto @ 2006-01-02 17:46 ` Carsten Otto 2006-01-02 19:01 ` Andi Kleen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Carsten Otto @ 2006-01-02 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 240 bytes --] On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:52:31PM +0100, Carsten Otto wrote: > How can I find that out? Can I provide any useful material? VIA KT800Pro > and 4GB RAM here.. VIA K8T800 Pro is correct. -- Carsten Otto c-otto@gmx.de www.c-otto.de [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-02 16:52 ` Carsten Otto 2006-01-02 17:46 ` Carsten Otto @ 2006-01-02 19:01 ` Andi Kleen 2006-01-03 22:54 ` Carsten Otto 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-02 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: c-otto; +Cc: linux-kernel Carsten Otto <c-otto@gmx.de> writes: [please don't strip cc lists like this - your email got nearly lost] > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:22:12PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > When you not compile in the SKGE network driver does everything else work? > > skge supports 64bit DMA, so it shouldn't use any IOMMU. But I'm somewhat > > suspicious of the >4GB support in the VIA chipset. We had problems with > > that before. It's possible that it's just not supported in the hardware > > or that the BIOS sets up the MTRRs wrong. > > How can I find that out? Can I provide any useful material? VIA KT800Pro > and 4GB RAM here.. What was unclear with my first question? Can you try that? To repeat it again: %% When you not compile in the SKGE network driver does everything else work? %% skge supports 64bit DMA, so it shouldn't use any IOMMU. Alternatively you can try with the appended patch. If that helps then the chipset or the BIOS likely has some fundamental issue with >4GB. -Andi Index: linux-2.6.15rc7-work/arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.15rc7-work.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c +++ linux-2.6.15rc7-work/arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c @@ -630,6 +630,13 @@ void dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, st int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) { +#if 1 + /* test patch for VIA quirk */ + if (mask > 0xffffffff) + return 0; +#endif + + /* Copied from i386. Doesn't make much sense, because it will only work for pci_alloc_coherent. The caller just has to use GFP_DMA in this case. */ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-02 19:01 ` Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-03 22:54 ` Carsten Otto 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Carsten Otto @ 2006-01-03 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 477 bytes --] On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:01:08PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Alternatively you can try with the appended patch. If that helps > then the chipset or the BIOS likely has some fundamental issue with >4GB. Based on the first few minutes of testing this works perfectly! Thanks a lot! PS: Does it make sense to contact my shop and/or Abit and/or VIA regarding this problem? I don't want to pay money for broken hardware. -- Carsten Otto c-otto@gmx.de www.c-otto.de [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-02 16:22 ` Andi Kleen 2006-01-02 16:52 ` Carsten Otto @ 2006-01-03 10:04 ` Dieter Stüken 2006-01-03 13:58 ` Andi Kleen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-03 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Andi Kleen wrote: > Can you please post the full boot log? > ... > When you not compile in the SKGE network driver does everything else work? > skge supports 64bit DMA, so it shouldn't use any IOMMU. But I'm somewhat > suspicious of the >4GB support in the VIA chipset. We had problems with > that before. It's possible that it's just not supported in the hardware > or that the BIOS sets up the MTRRs wrong. sorry for the delay, we are a few hors off here... here comes a more complete dmsg. Its a bit long, as its a large LVM system with 7 SATA disks attached. There are lots of messages about USB stuff, but I actually don't use any USB. But indeed I dicovered some mtrr message missed in the snipplet before. Unfortunately this is a production server, so I can't reboot and play with any time. But may be this night, in about 12h, I can perform further tests. Let me know, what kind of tests I may perform with all the SATA devices. I have a PDC-20378 and a VIA-VT6420 on board and a PDC-20318 on a PCI slot. Do those have any problems with 64-bit? For testing I would prefer to use them R/only. Would a parallel dummy tar to /dev/zero be meaningful?. Dieter. ----------- Bootdata ok (command line is root=/dev/sda1 log_buf_len=32k video=matroxfb:vesa:0x1B8 s) Linux version 2.6.15-rc7 (root@Rescue) (gcc version 3.3.5 20050117 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #9 Sun Jan 1 19:54:26 CET 2006 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000000e4000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000bff30000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 00000000bff30000 - 00000000bff40000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 00000000bff40000 - 00000000bfff0000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 00000000bfff0000 - 00000000c0000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fff80000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 0000000140000000 (usable) ACPI: RSDP (v002 ACPIAM ) @ 0x00000000000fa850 ACPI: XSDT (v001 A M I OEMXSDT 0x06000517 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x00000000bff30100 ACPI: FADT (v003 A M I OEMFACP 0x06000517 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x00000000bff30290 ACPI: MADT (v001 A M I OEMAPIC 0x06000517 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x00000000bff30390 ACPI: OEMB (v001 A M I OEMBIOS 0x06000517 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x00000000bff40040 ACPI: DSDT (v001 SK8V_ SK8V_033 0x00000033 MSFT 0x0100000d) @ 0x0000000000000000 On node 0 totalpages: 1029568 DMA zone: 3160 pages, LIFO batch:0 DMA32 zone: 767848 pages, LIFO batch:31 Normal zone: 258560 pages, LIFO batch:31 HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:0 Looks like a VIA chipset. Disabling IOMMU. Overwrite with "iommu=allowed" ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x808 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) Processor #0 15:5 APIC version 16 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x81] disabled) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0]) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 1, version 3, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) ACPI: IRQ0 used by override. ACPI: IRQ2 used by override. ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. Setting APIC routing to flat Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information Allocating PCI resources starting at c4000000 (gap: c0000000:3ff80000) Built 1 zonelists Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda1 log_buf_len=32k video=matroxfb:vesa:0x1B8 s Initializing CPU#0 PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 131072 bytes) time.c: Using 3.579545 MHz PM timer. time.c: Detected 2002.656 MHz processor. time.c: Using PIT/TSC based timekeeping. Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Dentry cache hash table entries: 524288 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 9, 2097152 bytes) Placing software IO TLB between 0x5c39000 - 0x9c39000 Memory: 4043548k/5242880k available (1809k kernel code, 148908k reserved, 770k data, 160k init) Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4014.56 BogoMIPS (lpj=8029129) Mount-cache hash table entries: 256 CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line) CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line) mtrr: v2.0 (20020519) CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 146 stepping 0a tbxface-0109 [02] load_tables : ACPI Tables successfully acquired Parsing all Control Methods:................................................................................................................................................... Table [DSDT](id 0005) - 538 Objects with 45 Devices 147 Methods 25 Regions ACPI Namespace successfully loaded at root ffffffff803b8dc0 evxfevnt-0091 [03] enable : Transition to ACPI mode successful Using local APIC timer interrupts. Detected 12.516 MHz APIC timer. testing NMI watchdog ... OK. checking if image is initramfs... it is NET: Registered protocol family 16 ACPI: bus type pci registered PCI: Using configuration type 1 ACPI: Subsystem revision 20050902 evgpeblk-0988 [06] ev_create_gpe_block : GPE 00 to 0F [_GPE] 2 regs on int 0x9 evgpeblk-0996 [06] ev_create_gpe_block : Found 7 Wake, Enabled 0 Runtime GPEs in this block Completing Region/Field/Buffer/Package initialization:.................................................................................................................................. Initialized 24/25 Regions 44/44 Fields 47/47 Buffers 15/16 Packages (547 nodes) Executing all Device _STA and_INI methods:................................................. 49 Devices found containing: 49 _STA, 0 _INI methods ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) Boot video device is 0000:01:00.0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 3 4 5 7 10 *11 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 5 7 *10 11 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 *5 7 10 11 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled. ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 4 5 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled. ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 3 4 5 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled. ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs 3 4 5 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled. ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 3 4 5 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled. PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing PCI: If a device doesn't work, try "pci=routeirq". If it helps, post a report agpgart: Detected AGP bridge 0 agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xf4000000 PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB) PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:01.0 IO window: disabled. MEM window: fbb00000-fcefffff PREFETCH window: efa00000-f39fffff acpi_bus-0201 [01] bus_set_power : Device is not power manageable PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:01.0 to 64 IA32 emulation $Id: sys_ia32.c,v 1.32 2002/03/24 13:02:28 ak Exp $ audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled) audit(1136141830.556:1): initialized Total HugeTLB memory allocated, 0 Initializing Cryptographic API io scheduler noop registered 0000:00:10.0: uhci_check_and_reset_hc: legsup = 0x8030 0000:00:10.0: Performing full reset 0000:00:10.1: uhci_check_and_reset_hc: legsup = 0x8030 0000:00:10.1: Performing full reset 0000:00:10.2: uhci_check_and_reset_hc: legsup = 0x8030 0000:00:10.2: Performing full reset 0000:00:10.3: uhci_check_and_reset_hc: legsup = 0x8030 0000:00:10.3: Performing full reset GSI 16 sharing vector 0xA9 and IRQ 16 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:01:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 matroxfb: Matrox G400 (AGP) detected PInS memtype = 0 mtrr: type mismatch for f0000000,1000000 old: write-back new: write-combining matroxfb: MTRR's turned on matroxfb: 1024x768x24bpp (virtual: 1024x5461) matroxfb: framebuffer at 0xF0000000, mapped to 0xffffc20000080000, size 16777216 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48 fb0: MATROX frame buffer device matroxfb_crtc2: secondary head of fb0 was registered as fb1 Real Time Clock Driver v1.12 Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12 serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1 RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 64000K size 1024 blocksize Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 6.1.16-k2-NAPI Copyright (c) 1999-2005 Intel Corporation. e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.4.14-k4-NAPI e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2005 Intel Corporation Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2 ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx VP_IDE: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:0f.1 acpi_bus-0201 [01] bus_set_power : Device is not power manageable GSI 17 sharing vector 0xB1 and IRQ 17 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0f.1[A] -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:0f.1, from 255 to 1 VP_IDE: chipset revision 6 VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later VP_IDE: VIA vt8237 (rev 00) IDE UDMA133 controller on pci0000:00:0f.1 ide0: BM-DMA at 0xfc00-0xfc07, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio ide1: BM-DMA at 0xfc08-0xfc0f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:DMA Probing IDE interface ide0... Probing IDE interface ide1... hdd: HL-DT-STDVD-ROM GDR8163B, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice NET: Registered protocol family 2 IP route cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes) TCP established hash table entries: 524288 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes) TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 7, 524288 bytes) TCP: Hash tables configured (established 524288 bind 65536) TCP reno registered input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /class/input/input0 ACPI wakeup devices: PCI0 PS2K PS2M UAR2 UAR1 AC97 USB1 USB2 USB3 USB4 EHCI PWRB SLPB ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S3 S4 S5) Freeing unused kernel memory: 160k freed SCSI subsystem initialized libata version 1.20 loaded. sata_promise 0000:00:08.0: version 1.03 GSI 18 sharing vector 0xB9 and IRQ 18 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:08.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000004200 ctl 0xFFFFC20000004238 bmdma 0x0 irq 18 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000004280 ctl 0xFFFFC200000042B8 bmdma 0x0 irq 18 ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4003 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4003 88:407f ata1: dev 0 ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 490234752 sectors: LBA48 ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi0 : sata_promise ata2: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:346b 83:7fe9 84:4773 85:3469 86:3c01 87:4763 88:407f ata2: dev 0 ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 976773168 sectors: LBA48 ata2: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi1 : sata_promise isa bounce pool size: 16 pages Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 7Y250M0 Rev: YAR5 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sda: 490234752 512-byte hdwr sectors (251000 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 490234752 512-byte hdwr sectors (251000 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda Vendor: ATA Model: HDS725050KLA360 Rev: K2AO Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdb: 976773168 512-byte hdwr sectors (500108 MB) SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back SCSI device sdb: 976773168 512-byte hdwr sectors (500108 MB) SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back sdb: sdb1 sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdb ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:09.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000006200 ctl 0xFFFFC20000006238 bmdma 0x0 irq 16 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000006280 ctl 0xFFFFC200000062B8 bmdma 0x0 irq 16 ata5: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000006300 ctl 0xFFFFC20000006338 bmdma 0x0 irq 16 ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000006380 ctl 0xFFFFC200000063B8 bmdma 0x0 irq 16 ata3: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:74eb 83:7fea 84:4023 85:74e9 86:3c02 87:4023 88:203f ata3: dev 0 ATA-6, max UDMA/100, 488397168 sectors: LBA48 ata3: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100 scsi2 : sata_promise ata4: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:74eb 83:7fea 84:4023 85:74e9 86:3c02 87:4023 88:203f ata4: dev 0 ATA-6, max UDMA/100, 488397168 sectors: LBA48 ata4: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100 scsi3 : sata_promise ata5: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:74eb 83:7fea 84:4023 85:74e9 86:3e02 87:4023 88:203f ata5: dev 0 ATA-6, max UDMA/100, 488397168 sectors: LBA48 ata5: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100 scsi4 : sata_promise ata6: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:74eb 83:7fea 84:4023 85:74e9 86:3e02 87:4023 88:203f ata6: dev 0 ATA-6, max UDMA/100, 488397168 sectors: LBA48 ata6: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100 scsi5 : sata_promise Vendor: ATA Model: HDS722525VLSA80 Rev: V36O Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdc: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back SCSI device sdc: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back sdc: sdc1 sd 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc Vendor: ATA Model: HDS722525VLSA80 Rev: V36O Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdd: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI device sdd: drive cache: write back SCSI device sdd: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI device sdd: drive cache: write back sdd: sdd1 sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdd Vendor: ATA Model: HDS722525VLSA80 Rev: V36O Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sde: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI device sde: drive cache: write back SCSI device sde: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI device sde: drive cache: write back sde: sde1 sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sde Vendor: ATA Model: HDS722525VLSA80 Rev: V36O Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdf: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI device sdf: drive cache: write back SCSI device sdf: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI device sdf: drive cache: write back sdf: sdf1 sd 5:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdf sata_via 0000:00:0f.0: version 1.1 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0f.0[B] -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:0f.0, from 10 to 1 sata_via 0000:00:0f.0: routed to hard irq line 1 ata7: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xE800 ctl 0xE402 bmdma 0xD400 irq 17 ata8: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xE000 ctl 0xD802 bmdma 0xD408 irq 17 ata7: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:74eb 83:7feb 84:4123 85:74e9 86:3c03 87:4123 88:407f ata7: dev 0 ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 781422768 sectors: LBA48 ata7: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi6 : sata_via ata8: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:74eb 83:7feb 84:4123 85:74e9 86:3c03 87:4123 88:407f ata8: dev 0 ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 781422768 sectors: LBA48 ata8: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi7 : sata_via Vendor: ATA Model: HDS724040KLSA80 Rev: KFAO Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdg: 781422768 512-byte hdwr sectors (400088 MB) SCSI device sdg: drive cache: write back SCSI device sdg: 781422768 512-byte hdwr sectors (400088 MB) SCSI device sdg: drive cache: write back sdg: sdg1 sd 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdg Vendor: ATA Model: HDS724040KLSA80 Rev: KFAO Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdh: 781422768 512-byte hdwr sectors (400088 MB) SCSI device sdh: drive cache: write back SCSI device sdh: 781422768 512-byte hdwr sectors (400088 MB) SCSI device sdh: drive cache: write back sdh: sdh1 sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdh GSI 19 sharing vector 0xC1 and IRQ 19 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0a.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0a.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 eth0: 3Com Gigabit LOM (3C940) PrefPort:A RlmtMode:Check Link State kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. usbcore: registered new driver usbfs usbcore: registered new driver hub ehci_hcd: block sizes: qh 160 qtd 96 itd 192 sitd 96 acpi_bus-0201 [01] bus_set_power : Device is not power manageable GSI 20 sharing vector 0xC9 and IRQ 20 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:10.4[C] -> GSI 21 (level, low) -> IRQ 20 PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:10.4, from 5 to 4 ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.4: EHCI Host Controller ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.4: reset hcs_params 0x4208 dbg=0 cc=4 pcc=2 ordered !ppc ports=8 ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.4: reset hcc_params 6872 thresh 7 uframes 256/512/1024 ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.4: capability 0001 at 68 ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.4: MWI active drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file 'devices' drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '001' ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.4: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.4: irq 20, io mem 0xfdf00000 ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.4: reset command 080002 (park)=0 ithresh=8 period=1024 Reset HALT ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.4: init command 010009 (park)=0 ithresh=1 period=256 RUN ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.4: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00, driver 10 Dec 2004 usb usb1: default language 0x0409 usb usb1: new device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 usb usb1: Product: EHCI Host Controller usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.15-rc7 ehci_hcd usb usb1: SerialNumber: 0000:00:10.4 usb usb1: hotplug usb usb1: adding 1-0:1.0 (config #1, interface 0) usb 1-0:1.0: hotplug hub 1-0:1.0: usb_probe_interface hub 1-0:1.0: usb_probe_interface - got id hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 1-0:1.0: 8 ports detected hub 1-0:1.0: standalone hub hub 1-0:1.0: no power switching (usb 1.0) hub 1-0:1.0: individual port over-current protection hub 1-0:1.0: Single TT hub 1-0:1.0: TT requires at most 8 FS bit times (666 ns) hub 1-0:1.0: power on to power good time: 20ms hub 1-0:1.0: local power source is good hub 1-0:1.0: state 5 ports 8 chg 0000 evt 0000 drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '001' ohci_hcd: 2005 April 22 USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver (PCI) ohci_hcd: block sizes: ed 80 td 96 USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v2.3 acpi_bus-0201 [01] bus_set_power : Device is not power manageable ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:10.0[A] -> GSI 21 (level, low) -> IRQ 20 PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:10.0, from 11 to 4 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: detected 2 ports uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: uhci_check_and_reset_hc: cmd = 0x0000 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: Performing full reset drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '002' uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: irq 20, io base 0x0000b400 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: supports USB remote wakeup usb usb2: default language 0x0409 usb usb2: new device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 usb usb2: Product: UHCI Host Controller usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.15-rc7 uhci_hcd usb usb2: SerialNumber: 0000:00:10.0 usb usb2: hotplug usb usb2: adding 2-0:1.0 (config #1, interface 0) usb 2-0:1.0: hotplug hub 2-0:1.0: usb_probe_interface hub 2-0:1.0: usb_probe_interface - got id hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected hub 2-0:1.0: standalone hub hub 2-0:1.0: no power switching (usb 1.0) hub 2-0:1.0: individual port over-current protection hub 2-0:1.0: power on to power good time: 2ms hub 2-0:1.0: local power source is good hub 2-0:1.0: state 5 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '001' uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: port 1 portsc 018a,00 hub 2-0:1.0: port 1, status 0300, change 0003, 1.5 Mb/s acpi_bus-0201 [01] bus_set_power : Device is not power manageable ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:10.1[A] -> GSI 21 (level, low) -> IRQ 20 PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:10.1, from 11 to 4 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: detected 2 ports uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: uhci_check_and_reset_hc: cmd = 0x0000 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: Performing full reset drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '003' uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: irq 20, io base 0x0000b800 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: supports USB remote wakeup usb usb3: default language 0x0409 usb usb3: new device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 usb usb3: Product: UHCI Host Controller usb usb3: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.15-rc7 uhci_hcd usb usb3: SerialNumber: 0000:00:10.1 usb usb3: hotplug usb usb3: adding 3-0:1.0 (config #1, interface 0) usb 3-0:1.0: hotplug hub 3-0:1.0: usb_probe_interface hub 3-0:1.0: usb_probe_interface - got id hub 3-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 3-0:1.0: 2 ports detected hub 3-0:1.0: standalone hub hub 3-0:1.0: no power switching (usb 1.0) hub 3-0:1.0: individual port over-current protection hub 3-0:1.0: power on to power good time: 2ms hub 3-0:1.0: local power source is good hub 2-0:1.0: debounce: port 1: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x300 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: port 2 portsc 008a,00 hub 2-0:1.0: port 2, status 0100, change 0003, 12 Mb/s drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '001' acpi_bus-0201 [01] bus_set_power : Device is not power manageable ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:10.2[B] -> GSI 21 (level, low) -> IRQ 20 PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:10.2, from 10 to 4 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: detected 2 ports uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: uhci_check_and_reset_hc: cmd = 0x0000 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: Performing full reset drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '004' uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 4 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: irq 20, io base 0x0000c000 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: supports USB remote wakeup usb usb4: default language 0x0409 usb usb4: new device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 usb usb4: Product: UHCI Host Controller usb usb4: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.15-rc7 uhci_hcd usb usb4: SerialNumber: 0000:00:10.2 usb usb4: hotplug usb usb4: adding 4-0:1.0 (config #1, interface 0) usb 4-0:1.0: hotplug hub 4-0:1.0: usb_probe_interface hub 4-0:1.0: usb_probe_interface - got id hub 4-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 4-0:1.0: 2 ports detected hub 4-0:1.0: standalone hub hub 4-0:1.0: no power switching (usb 1.0) hub 4-0:1.0: individual port over-current protection hub 4-0:1.0: power on to power good time: 2ms hub 4-0:1.0: local power source is good hub 2-0:1.0: debounce: port 2: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x100 hub 2-0:1.0: state 5 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 hub 3-0:1.0: state 5 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0006 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: port 1 portsc 018a,00 hub 3-0:1.0: port 1, status 0300, change 0003, 1.5 Mb/s drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '001' acpi_bus-0201 [01] bus_set_power : Device is not power manageable ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:10.3[B] -> GSI 21 (level, low) -> IRQ 20 PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:10.3, from 10 to 4 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: detected 2 ports uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: uhci_check_and_reset_hc: cmd = 0x0000 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: Performing full reset drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '005' uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 5 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: irq 20, io base 0x0000c400 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: supports USB remote wakeup usb usb5: default language 0x0409 usb usb5: new device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 usb usb5: Product: UHCI Host Controller usb usb5: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.15-rc7 uhci_hcd usb usb5: SerialNumber: 0000:00:10.3 usb usb5: hotplug usb usb5: adding 5-0:1.0 (config #1, interface 0) usb 5-0:1.0: hotplug hub 5-0:1.0: usb_probe_interface hub 5-0:1.0: usb_probe_interface - got id hub 5-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 5-0:1.0: 2 ports detected hub 5-0:1.0: standalone hub hub 5-0:1.0: no power switching (usb 1.0) hub 5-0:1.0: individual port over-current protection hub 5-0:1.0: power on to power good time: 2ms hub 5-0:1.0: local power source is good drivers/usb/core/inode.c: creating file '001' hub 3-0:1.0: debounce: port 1: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x300 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: port 2 portsc 018a,00 hub 3-0:1.0: port 2, status 0300, change 0003, 1.5 Mb/s hub 3-0:1.0: debounce: port 2: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x300 hub 4-0:1.0: state 5 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0006 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: port 1 portsc 008a,00 hub 4-0:1.0: port 1, status 0100, change 0003, 12 Mb/s hub 4-0:1.0: debounce: port 1: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x100 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: port 2 portsc 018a,00 hub 4-0:1.0: port 2, status 0300, change 0003, 1.5 Mb/s hub 4-0:1.0: debounce: port 2: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x300 hub 3-0:1.0: state 5 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 hub 5-0:1.0: state 5 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0006 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: port 1 portsc 008a,00 hub 5-0:1.0: port 1, status 0100, change 0003, 12 Mb/s hub 5-0:1.0: debounce: port 1: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x100 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: port 2 portsc 018a,00 hub 5-0:1.0: port 2, status 0300, change 0003, 1.5 Mb/s hub 5-0:1.0: debounce: port 2: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x300 hub 5-0:1.0: state 5 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: suspend_rh (auto-stop) uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: suspend_rh (auto-stop) uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: suspend_rh (auto-stop) uhci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: suspend_rh (auto-stop) usbcore: registered new driver hiddev usbcore: registered new driver usbhid drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: v2.6:USB HID core driver NET: Registered protocol family 1 EXT3 FS on sda1, internal journal ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-03 10:04 ` Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-03 13:58 ` Andi Kleen 2006-01-03 19:56 ` Dieter Stüken ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-03 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dieter Stüken; +Cc: linux-kernel Dieter Stüken <stueken@conterra.de> writes: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > Can you please post the full boot log? ... > > When you not compile in the SKGE network driver does everything else work? > > skge supports 64bit DMA, so it shouldn't use any IOMMU. But I'm somewhat > > suspicious of the >4GB support in the VIA chipset. We had problems with > > that before. It's possible that it's just not supported in the hardware > > or that the BIOS sets up the MTRRs wrong. > > sorry for the delay, we are a few hors off here... Does everything work (including the SKGE) driver when you boot with swiotlb=force ? -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-03 13:58 ` Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-03 19:56 ` Dieter Stüken 2006-01-03 21:08 ` Dieter Stüken ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-03 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Andi Kleen wrote: > Does everything work (including the SKGE) driver > when you boot with swiotlb=force ? Yes, it seems to work so far! I'm just reading some GB via NFS (while writing this mail on the same host). I already performed some other test: without initializing the network (and still without swiotlb=force) all my SATA controller seem to work properly. I did a "dd bs=400M" on each in parallel. So I'm sure that each of my 4G was involved. (also I'm not sure, if EACH of my 3 controllers really used something above 3G) All this was still with an unpatched 2.6.15-rc7 and with IOMMU disabled. So I could either try "iommu=allowed", as suggested by dmesg from check_ioapic() or I may apply the suggested patch for pci-gart.c, or both with and without network.... May be I report about soon, else tomorrow. Dieter. -- Dieter Stüken, con terra GmbH, Münster stueken@conterra.de http://www.conterra.de/ (0)251-7474-501 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-03 13:58 ` Andi Kleen 2006-01-03 19:56 ` Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-03 21:08 ` Dieter Stüken 2006-01-03 21:26 ` Andi Kleen 2006-01-04 10:27 ` Dieter Stüken 2006-01-04 10:57 ` Dieter Stüken 3 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-03 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel OK, here are my last results for today: using "iommu=allowed" did not work. System freezes during initialization of the PDC20318, which is on the external PCI bus. But swiotlb=force works well! Using the patch for pci-gart.c currently works while reading data on all 8 disks in parallel, reading data via NFS and writing this mail. The pci-gart.c patch seems to disable dma. Is this the DMA my PCI devices perform them self? As I learned, they may perform DMA even above 4g if all works well. Thus I may be happy without any IOMMU. As I saw my system working even without this patch, I will turn back to the original 2.6.15-rc7 an continue running this torture test during this night. Dieter. -- Dieter Stüken, con terra GmbH, Münster stueken@conterra.de http://www.conterra.de/ (0)251-7474-501 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-03 21:08 ` Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-03 21:26 ` Andi Kleen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-03 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Dieter_St=FCken?= <stueken"; +Cc: linux-kernel Dieter Stüken <stueken@conterra.de> writes: [can you please not always drop me from cc with each reply?] Dieter Stüken <stueken@conterra.de> writes: > OK, here are my last results for today: > > using "iommu=allowed" did not work. System freezes during initialization > of the PDC20318, which is on the external PCI bus. > > But swiotlb=force works well! This means your PCI bridge doesn't support addresses >4GB. > The pci-gart.c patch seems to disable dma. Only DMA for addresses >4GB. > Is this the DMA my PCI devices > perform them self? As I learned, they may perform DMA even above 4g if all > works well. Thus I may be happy without any IOMMU. As I saw my system working > even without this patch, I will turn back to the original 2.6.15-rc7 an continue > running this torture test during this night. The patch should perform slightly better than swiotlb=force because it will only force bounce buffering for addresses >4GB. If your torture test involves more than 64MB of IO in flight you might also need to increase the bounce buffer area with swiotlb=128M or somesuch. -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-03 13:58 ` Andi Kleen 2006-01-03 19:56 ` Dieter Stüken 2006-01-03 21:08 ` Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-04 10:27 ` Dieter Stüken 2006-01-04 10:57 ` Andi Kleen 2006-01-04 10:57 ` Dieter Stüken 3 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-04 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel Andi Kleen wrote: > [can you please not always drop me from cc with each reply?] sorry, I thought the other way around: it would be annoying to get each mail twice... I just found a mailing list "discuss@x86-64.org". Would it be better to turn over there, instead of polluting linux.kernel by this? >> But swiotlb=force works well! > > This means your PCI bridge doesn't support addresses >4GB. > >> The pci-gart.c patch seems to disable dma. > > Only DMA for addresses >4GB. > > If your torture test involves more than 64MB of IO in flight > you might also need to increase the bounce buffer area > with swiotlb=128M or somesuch. I'm about to understand whats going on. So should I use the dma patch INSTEAD of "swiotlb=force"? I'll try that tonight. > When you not compile in the SKGE network driver does everything else work? I may test it again, but all seemed to work without any patch or swiotlb settings when running without the SKGE network driver. So, how does this work, if my PCI bridge generally fails above 4G? Problems arise not until I enable/use the network driver. Does the dma-patch disable DMA for all PCI devices or only for those which cause problems (like my SKGE)? Dieter. -- Dieter Stüken, con terra GmbH, Münster stueken@conterra.de http://www.conterra.de/ (0)251-7474-501 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-04 10:27 ` Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-04 10:57 ` Andi Kleen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-01-04 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dieter Stüken; +Cc: linux-kernel On Wednesday 04 January 2006 11:27, Dieter Stüken wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > [can you please not always drop me from cc with each reply?] > > sorry, I thought the other way around: it would be annoying > to get each mail twice... > > I just found a mailing list "discuss@x86-64.org". Would it be > better to turn over there, instead of polluting linux.kernel > by this? I already cc'ed it with the reply to your first mail, but you and your colleague with the same problem persistently destroyed the cc list with each reply so I gave up eventually. No need to send it there again now. > > >> But swiotlb=force works well! > > > > This means your PCI bridge doesn't support addresses >4GB. > > > >> The pci-gart.c patch seems to disable dma. > > > > Only DMA for addresses >4GB. > > > > If your torture test involves more than 64MB of IO in flight > > you might also need to increase the bounce buffer area > > with swiotlb=128M or somesuch. > > I'm about to understand whats going on. So should I use the > dma patch INSTEAD of "swiotlb=force"? I'll try that tonight. > > > When you not compile in the SKGE network driver does everything else work? > > I may test it again, but all seemed to work without any patch or > swiotlb settings when running without the SKGE network driver. That's likely because the SKGE driver is your only device that can DMA >4GB. Typical lowend IDE, sound etc. devices have already 4GB limits and would be forced through bounce buffering anyways. The patch just forces that for all devices. Also it's only a hack and would need to be made VIA specific. But I'm trying to get confirmation of the problem from VIA first because it's pretty drastic action. It's still possible that it's only a BIOS bug or somesuch that could be worked around by setting the right magic bits We had a similar problem some time ago with a small number of NF4 boards where it turned out to be a broken BIOS not programming the bridge correclty. One contributing factor is likely that the cheap boards are normally not tested with 4GB RAM, and VIA is normally only found on cheap boards. -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems 2006-01-03 13:58 ` Andi Kleen ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2006-01-04 10:27 ` Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-04 10:57 ` Dieter Stüken 3 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Dieter Stüken @ 2006-01-04 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel Andi Kleen wrote: > Does everything work (including the SKGE) driver > when you boot with swiotlb=force ? I just realize there are TWO modules to get my 3c940 running: skge and sk98lin. All my problems posted so far were related to the sk98lin module, I used until now. I'll try to use the skge module as soon as I'm able to reboot. Dieter. -- Dieter Stüken, con terra GmbH, Münster stueken@conterra.de http://www.conterra.de/ (0)251-7474-501 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-04 10:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <5qvTv-8f-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5qAKf-7n4-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-02 19:18 ` X86_64 + VIA + 4g problems Robert Hancock
2006-01-02 19:53 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-02 20:15 ` Robert Hancock
2006-01-02 20:39 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <5qBcJ-7ZZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5qDez-2Qf-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5r2nz-63n-233@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-04 3:03 ` Robert Hancock
2006-01-02 11:09 Dieter Stüken
2006-01-02 12:26 ` Carsten Otto
2006-01-02 16:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-02 16:52 ` Carsten Otto
2006-01-02 17:46 ` Carsten Otto
2006-01-02 19:01 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-03 22:54 ` Carsten Otto
2006-01-03 10:04 ` Dieter Stüken
2006-01-03 13:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-03 19:56 ` Dieter Stüken
2006-01-03 21:08 ` Dieter Stüken
2006-01-03 21:26 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-04 10:27 ` Dieter Stüken
2006-01-04 10:57 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-04 10:57 ` Dieter Stüken
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox