From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/19] mutex subsystem, add include/asm-i386/mutex.h
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:25:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BA7B2E.4070101@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060103100737.GD23289@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
>
> add the i386 version of mutex.h, optimized in assembly.
>
> +static inline int
> +__mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
> +{
> + /*
> + * We have two variants here. The cmpxchg based one is the best one
> + * because it never induce a false contention state. It is included
> + * here because architectures using the inc/dec algorithms over the
> + * xchg ones are much more likely to support cmpxchg natively.
> + *
> + * If not we fall back to the spinlock based variant - that is
> + * just as efficient (and simpler) as a 'destructive' probing of
> + * the mutex state would be.
> + */
> +#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG
> + if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0)) == 1)
> + return 1;
> + return 0;
> +#else
> + return fail_fn(count);
> +#endif
> +}
asm-i386 version I think really should just use atomic_cmpxchg unconditionally,
because otherwise an i386 compatible kernel will not use cmpxchg even when
running on 486+ (not sure how important that is these days, but still...).
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-03 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-03 10:07 [patch 04/19] mutex subsystem, add include/asm-i386/mutex.h Ingo Molnar
2006-01-03 13:25 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-01-03 15:21 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-03 16:46 Ingo Molnar
2006-01-02 16:33 Ingo Molnar, Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43BA7B2E.4070101@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jes@trained-monkey.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox