* Re: merging ocfs2?
2006-01-05 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2006-01-05 1:09 ` Zach Brown
2006-01-05 1:11 ` Wim Coekaerts
2006-01-05 1:22 ` Joel Becker
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Zach Brown @ 2006-01-05 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Andrew Morton, Joel Becker, Arjan van de Ven, Christoph Hellwig,
Wim Coekaerts, Mark Fasheh, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Zach Brown wrote:
>> http://oss.oracle.com/git/ocfs2.git
>
> If Christoph is happy with it, and there has been no grumbling from -mm, I
> can certainly merge it.
>
> However, I really _really_ prefer that people who use git to merge use the
> native git protocol, which I trust. That http: thing may work, but it's a
> cludge ;)
>
> Can you run git-daemon on the machine?
Hmm, that's a good question. I fear that machine is hiding in some firewalled
bunker somewhere. Joel?
- z
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: merging ocfs2?
2006-01-05 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-05 1:09 ` Zach Brown
@ 2006-01-05 1:22 ` Joel Becker
2006-01-05 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-01-06 4:38 ` Wim Coekaerts
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joel Becker @ 2006-01-05 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Zach Brown, Andrew Morton, Arjan van de Ven, Christoph Hellwig,
Wim Coekaerts, Mark Fasheh, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:50:49PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> However, I really _really_ prefer that people who use git to merge use the
> native git protocol, which I trust. That http: thing may work, but it's a
> cludge ;)
>
> Can you run git-daemon on the machine?
Getting that port open is in progress. http: is the for-now
solution.
Joel
--
"Practice random acts of kindness and senseless acts of beauty."
Oh, and don't forget where your towel is.
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: merging ocfs2?
2006-01-05 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-05 1:09 ` Zach Brown
2006-01-05 1:22 ` Joel Becker
@ 2006-01-05 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-01-06 4:38 ` Wim Coekaerts
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2006-01-05 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Zach Brown, Andrew Morton, Joel Becker, Arjan van de Ven,
Christoph Hellwig, Wim Coekaerts, Mark Fasheh,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:50:49PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Zach Brown wrote:
> >
> > Joel has done the heavy lifting to bring its git repository up to date
> > so one should be able to pull from:
> >
> > http://oss.oracle.com/git/ocfs2.git
>
> If Christoph is happy with it, and there has been no grumbling from -mm, I
> can certainly merge it.
Last time I looked it seemed fine. That's been about a month ago and
I don't have time to look over it again currently. I'd say merge it and
blame everything on me if something horrible is hidden inside now :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: merging ocfs2?
2006-01-05 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-05 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2006-01-06 4:38 ` Wim Coekaerts
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wim Coekaerts @ 2006-01-06 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Zach Brown, Andrew Morton, Joel Becker, Christoph Hellwig,
Mark Fasheh, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:50:49PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Zach Brown wrote:
> > Joel has done the heavy lifting to bring its git repository up to date
> > so one should be able to pull from:
> >
> > http://oss.oracle.com/git/ocfs2.git
>
> If Christoph is happy with it, and there has been no grumbling from -mm, I
> can certainly merge it.
Linus, the code has been carried in -mm since 2.6.12-rc4-mm1 and hch
just said he's fine with it - please merge when you can.
> However, I really _really_ prefer that people who use git to merge use the
> native git protocol, which I trust. That http: thing may work, but it's a
> cludge ;)
>
> Can you run git-daemon on the machine?
we will going forward - need to get some admins to do stuff, otherwise
if you want it from day 1 we can get it on kernel.org/git. but my guess
is that it will only be a little while and the first updates will come
through git-daemon (eg a week or so)
thanks
Wim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread