From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce sizeof(percpu_data) and removes dependance against NR_CPUS
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:33:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BD2E37.203@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060105060050.37ec91d3.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote:
>> Current sizeof(percpu_data) is NR_CPUS*sizeof(void *)
>>
>> This trivial patch makes percpu_data real size depends on
>> highest_possible_processor_id() instead of NR_CPUS
>>
>> percpu_data allocations are not performance critical, we can spend few CPU
>> cycles and save some ram.
>
> hm, highest_possible_processor_id() isn't very efficient. And it's quite
> dopey that it's a macro. We should turn it into a real function which
> caches its return result and goes BUG if it's called before
> cpu_possible_map is initialised.
I agree, I will see if I can do that without poking in every arch :(
More over, my patch has an error on pdsize computation, it should be :
size_t pdsize = (highest_possible_processor_id() + 1) * sizeof(void *);
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-05 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-22 11:42 [PATCH] Debug shared irqs David Woodhouse
2006-01-05 10:19 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-05 10:39 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-05 11:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-05 10:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-05 13:49 ` [PATCH] reduce sizeof(percpu_data) and removes dependance against NR_CPUS Eric Dumazet
2006-01-05 14:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-05 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2006-01-06 7:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-06 7:27 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-06 7:29 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43BD2E37.203@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox