From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
Shai Fultheim <shai@scalex86.org>,
Nippun Goel <nippung@calsoftinc.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] Avoid taking global tasklist_lock for single threadedprocess at getrusage()
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:17:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BD70AD.21FC6862@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060104231600.GA3664@localhost.localdomain
Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>
> + need_lock = (p == current && thread_group_empty(p));
This should be
need_lock = !(p == current && thread_group_empty(p));
I think we should cleanup k_getrusage() first, see the patch below.
Do you agree with that patch? If yes, could you make the new one on
top of it? (please send them both to Andrew).
Note that after this cleanup we don't have code duplication.
[PATCH] simplify k_getrusage()
Factor out common code for different RUSAGE_xxx cases.
Don't take ->sighand->siglock in RUSAGE_SELF case, suggested
by Ravikiran G Thirumalai.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
--- K/kernel/sys.c~ 2006-01-03 21:15:58.000000000 +0300
+++ K/kernel/sys.c 2006-01-06 00:40:34.000000000 +0300
@@ -1687,7 +1687,10 @@ static void k_getrusage(struct task_stru
if (unlikely(!p->signal))
return;
+ utime = stime = cputime_zero;
+
switch (who) {
+ case RUSAGE_BOTH:
case RUSAGE_CHILDREN:
spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
utime = p->signal->cutime;
@@ -1697,22 +1700,11 @@ static void k_getrusage(struct task_stru
r->ru_minflt = p->signal->cmin_flt;
r->ru_majflt = p->signal->cmaj_flt;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
- cputime_to_timeval(utime, &r->ru_utime);
- cputime_to_timeval(stime, &r->ru_stime);
- break;
+
+ if (who == RUSAGE_CHILDREN)
+ break;
+
case RUSAGE_SELF:
- spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
- utime = stime = cputime_zero;
- goto sum_group;
- case RUSAGE_BOTH:
- spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
- utime = p->signal->cutime;
- stime = p->signal->cstime;
- r->ru_nvcsw = p->signal->cnvcsw;
- r->ru_nivcsw = p->signal->cnivcsw;
- r->ru_minflt = p->signal->cmin_flt;
- r->ru_majflt = p->signal->cmaj_flt;
- sum_group:
utime = cputime_add(utime, p->signal->utime);
stime = cputime_add(stime, p->signal->stime);
r->ru_nvcsw += p->signal->nvcsw;
@@ -1729,13 +1721,14 @@ static void k_getrusage(struct task_stru
r->ru_majflt += t->maj_flt;
t = next_thread(t);
} while (t != p);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
- cputime_to_timeval(utime, &r->ru_utime);
- cputime_to_timeval(stime, &r->ru_stime);
break;
+
default:
BUG();
}
+
+ cputime_to_timeval(utime, &r->ru_utime);
+ cputime_to_timeval(stime, &r->ru_stime);
}
int getrusage(struct task_struct *p, int who, struct rusage __user *ru)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-05 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-24 17:52 [rfc][patch] Avoid taking global tasklist_lock for single threaded process at getrusage() Oleg Nesterov
2005-12-27 20:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-12-28 12:38 ` [rfc][patch] Avoid taking global tasklist_lock for single threadedprocess " Oleg Nesterov
2005-12-28 18:33 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-28 22:57 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-30 17:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-04 23:16 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-01-05 19:17 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2006-01-06 9:46 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-01-06 17:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-06 19:46 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-20 18:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-22 22:18 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-23 18:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-06 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-08 11:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-08 19:58 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-01-09 18:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-09 20:54 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-01-10 19:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-16 20:56 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-01-17 19:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-17 19:52 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-01-18 9:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-03 18:18 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43BD70AD.21FC6862@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nippung@calsoftinc.com \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox