* [PATCH] lib: Fix bug in int_sqrt() for 64 bit longs
@ 2006-01-06 5:13 Peter Williams
2006-01-06 6:42 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Williams @ 2006-01-06 5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 546 bytes --]
The implementation of int_sqrt() assumes that longs have 32 bits. On
systems that have 64 bit longs this will result in gross errors when the
argument to the function is greater than 2^32 - 1 on such systems. I
doubt whether any such use is currently made of int_sqrt() but the
attached patch fixes the problem anyway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.com.au>
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
[-- Attachment #2: fix-int_sqrt_bug --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 411 bytes --]
Index: GIT-warnings/lib/int_sqrt.c
===================================================================
--- GIT-warnings.orig/lib/int_sqrt.c 2005-10-25 13:55:22.000000000 +1000
+++ GIT-warnings/lib/int_sqrt.c 2006-01-06 14:29:19.000000000 +1100
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ unsigned long int_sqrt(unsigned long x)
op = x;
res = 0;
- one = 1 << 30;
+ one = 1 << (BITS_PER_LONG - 2);
while (one > op)
one >>= 2;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] lib: Fix bug in int_sqrt() for 64 bit longs
2006-01-06 5:13 [PATCH] lib: Fix bug in int_sqrt() for 64 bit longs Peter Williams
@ 2006-01-06 6:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 23:21 ` Peter Williams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2006-01-06 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Williams; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Peter Williams a écrit :
> The implementation of int_sqrt() assumes that longs have 32 bits. On
> systems that have 64 bit longs this will result in gross errors when the
> argument to the function is greater than 2^32 - 1 on such systems. I
> doubt whether any such use is currently made of int_sqrt() but the
> attached patch fixes the problem anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.com.au>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Index: GIT-warnings/lib/int_sqrt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- GIT-warnings.orig/lib/int_sqrt.c 2005-10-25 13:55:22.000000000 +1000
> +++ GIT-warnings/lib/int_sqrt.c 2006-01-06 14:29:19.000000000 +1100
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ unsigned long int_sqrt(unsigned long x)
> op = x;
> res = 0;
>
> - one = 1 << 30;
> + one = 1 << (BITS_PER_LONG - 2);
> while (one > op)
> one >>= 2;
>
Are you sure it works ?
I would have writen :
one = 1L << (BITS_PER_LONG - 2);
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] lib: Fix bug in int_sqrt() for 64 bit longs
2006-01-06 6:42 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2006-01-06 23:21 ` Peter Williams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Williams @ 2006-01-06 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Peter Williams a écrit :
>
>> The implementation of int_sqrt() assumes that longs have 32 bits. On
>> systems that have 64 bit longs this will result in gross errors when
>> the argument to the function is greater than 2^32 - 1 on such systems.
>> I doubt whether any such use is currently made of int_sqrt() but the
>> attached patch fixes the problem anyway.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.com.au>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Index: GIT-warnings/lib/int_sqrt.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- GIT-warnings.orig/lib/int_sqrt.c 2005-10-25 13:55:22.000000000
>> +1000
>> +++ GIT-warnings/lib/int_sqrt.c 2006-01-06 14:29:19.000000000 +1100
>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ unsigned long int_sqrt(unsigned long x)
>> op = x;
>> res = 0;
>>
>> - one = 1 << 30;
>> + one = 1 << (BITS_PER_LONG - 2);
>> while (one > op)
>> one >>= 2;
>>
>
>
> Are you sure it works ?
>
> I would have writen :
>
> one = 1L << (BITS_PER_LONG - 2);
I think you're right as just using 1 would make the expression an
integer variable and the compiler would complain about shifting too far
unless integers were the same size as longs. (I don't have a 64 bit
system to confirm that on which is why it snuck by me. :-()
Thanks
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-06 23:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-06 5:13 [PATCH] lib: Fix bug in int_sqrt() for 64 bit longs Peter Williams
2006-01-06 6:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 23:21 ` Peter Williams
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox