public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Shrinks sizeof(files_struct) and better layout
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:37:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BE1E46.3060904@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0601052318570.1708@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>

David Lang a écrit :
> Ok, so if you have large numbers of CPU's and large page sizes it's not 
> useful. however, what about a 2-4 cpu machine with 4k page sizes, 8-32G 
> of ram (a not unreasonable Opteron system config) that will be running 
> 5,000-20,000 processes/threads?

Dont forget 'struct files_struct' are shared between threads of one process.

So may benefit from this 'special cache' only if you plan to run 20.000 processes.

> 
> I know people argue that programs that do such things are bad (and I 
> definantly agree that they aren't optimized), but the reality is that 
> some workloads are like that. if a machine is being built for such uses 
> configuring the kernel to better tolorate such use may be useful

If 20.000 process runs on a machine, I doubt the main problem of sysadmin is 
about the 'struct files_struct' placement in memory :)

Eric


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-06  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20051108185349.6e86cec3.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found] ` <437226B1.4040901@cosmosbay.com>
     [not found]   ` <20051109220742.067c5f3a.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found]     ` <4373698F.9010608@cosmosbay.com>
2006-01-04  0:06       ` [PATCH] Shrinks sizeof(files_struct) and better layout Eric Dumazet
2006-01-04  9:11         ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-04 10:12           ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-04 10:28             ` Folkert van Heusden
2006-01-04 10:45         ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-04 11:13           ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-04 11:15             ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-04 11:19               ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-04 11:22                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-04 11:41                   ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-04 11:58                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-06  3:01             ` David Lang
2006-01-06  6:35               ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06  7:26                 ` David Lang
2006-01-06  7:37                   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2006-01-06  8:28                     ` David Lang
2006-01-04 11:45         ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-04 13:14           ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-04 23:24           ` [2.6 patch] Define BITS_PER_BYTE Adrian Bunk
2006-01-05  7:03             ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-05 15:18               ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-01-05 19:19                 ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43BE1E46.3060904@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=dlang@digitalinsight.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox