From: Tim Tassonis <timtas@cubic.ch>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: State of the Union: Wireless
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:38:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C3AAE2.1090900@cubic.ch> (raw)
>
> I don't like the idea of maintaining two of anything. What if I have two
> wireless interfaces, each using a different stack?
>
> Performance--,
> Kernel size++
>
> I get that it's hard to get everyone to agree on one stack or another, but we
> need to make the decision now because the longer we don't have a decision
> made (this includes maintaining two in-tree stacks) the longer it's going to
> take us to have serious / robust / reliable / consistent wireless support.
This is exactly the opposite of what Linus proposes in his management
style document: "Avoid making decisions". At the moment, nobody seems to
know what the "right" direction is, because the right direction is the
one that will produce the better wireless support, and not the one that
sounds better at the moment.
I therefore also vote for merging both stacks.
> We can always undo mistakes later, but
> we'll never get to that point if we don't start moving in one direction
> instead of ten.
You were right if there were ten, but there seem to be only two at the
moment. One stack will survive and one will die. There's no point in
deciding this now.
Tim
next reply other threads:[~2006-01-10 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-10 12:38 Tim Tassonis [this message]
2006-01-10 12:53 ` State of the Union: Wireless Adrian Bunk
2006-01-10 13:34 ` Tim Tassonis
2006-01-10 14:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-10 16:07 ` Tim Tassonis
2006-01-10 16:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-10 16:17 ` Tim Tassonis
2006-01-11 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-14 9:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-10 14:16 ` Chase Venters
[not found] ` <mailman.1136898727.7233.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2006-01-11 0:03 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-01-11 0:29 ` Adrian Bunk
[not found] <1136541243.4037.18.camel@localhost>
2006-01-06 11:00 ` [Bcm43xx-dev] [Fwd: State of the Union: Wireless] Michael Buesch
2006-01-06 16:04 ` State of the Union: Wireless Mike Kershaw
[not found] <5rRp0-4X1-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-06 5:39 ` Robert Hancock
2006-01-06 6:42 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-06 10:26 ` Alistair John Strachan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-06 4:22 Jeff Garzik
2006-01-06 11:31 ` Johannes Berg
2006-01-06 11:46 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-06 12:26 ` Johannes Berg
2006-01-06 12:48 ` Stefan Rompf
2006-01-06 12:53 ` Johannes Berg
2006-01-07 14:49 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-10 13:18 ` Johannes Berg
2006-01-10 6:39 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-10 8:36 ` Chase Venters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43C3AAE2.1090900@cubic.ch \
--to=timtas@cubic.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox