public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Mike D. Day" <ncmike@us.ibm.com>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH] sysfs support for Xen attributes
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:49:02 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C67A6E.3060708@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1137080242.5397.37.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Dave Hansen wrote:

>The ppc64 hypervisor does something like this today in a couple of
>places.  It is kinda a mess.  I think that putting a generic, binary
>firmware interface leads to having a bit of a crutch.  It basically lets
>the userspace software stack bypass Linux and talk directly to the
>hypervisor.  It also means that you have to have a very specialized
>software stack for each hypervisor or virtualization type, which is very
>bad.
>
>This pushes things out to userspace, which is generally good.  But, it
>is pushing behavior and "hardware" knowledge out there, too.  The
>hardware knowledge, especially, is something that we usually try to
>encapsulate.
>  
>
The Xen virtual hardware is exposed in the normal way (there is a Xen 
bus so Xen devices show up under that).

>Also things like inter-partition page sharing, and partition migration
>are used in other hypervisors.  I think it is essential to get common
>interfaces to those things.
>  
>
In very, very different ways though.

>One last thing...  When you say "very strongly binary" do you mean, "are
>implemented now as very strongly binary", or "absolutely 100% have to be
>horribly strongly binary"?  They are two quite different things. :)
>  
>
To expose the hypercalls to userspace via sysfs (or another high level 
interface) would require a whole bunch of complex code to encode the 
hypercalls and decode there results.  I'm not sure having a common 
interface is a compelling argument to justify this kernel-level 
complexity since one can just standardize on a userspace library 
(something like http://www.libvir.org).

I do agree we need a common interface though...

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>-- Dave
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>  
>


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-12 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-11 17:17 [RFC] [PATCH] sysfs support for Xen attributes Mike D. Day
2006-01-11 17:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-11 17:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-01-11 18:45 ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-11 23:07 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12  0:23   ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-12  0:57     ` Greg KH
2006-01-12  1:49       ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-12  2:17         ` [Xen-devel] " Mark Williamson
2006-01-12  7:10         ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 14:44           ` [Xen-devel] " Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 14:53             ` Mark Williamson
2006-01-12 15:42               ` Anthony Liguori
2006-01-12 15:57             ` Anthony Liguori
2006-01-12 17:34               ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 18:44                 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-01-12 17:43             ` Greg KH
2006-01-12  9:10         ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-12 14:52           ` [Xen-devel] " Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 15:28             ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-12 15:50               ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 12:54         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2006-01-12 13:21           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-12 14:42             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2006-01-12 17:39               ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 18:53                 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-01-12 18:55                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-12 18:59                     ` Anthony Liguori
2006-01-12 19:11                       ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 19:31                         ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 19:08                   ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 19:18                     ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 19:30                       ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 17:38           ` Greg KH
2006-01-12  1:32     ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-12 10:04       ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2006-01-12 15:14         ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-12 15:06           ` Mark Williamson
2006-01-12 15:26           ` Keir Fraser
2006-01-12 15:37             ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-12 15:49               ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2006-01-11 23:31 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-12 19:01   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43C67A6E.3060708@us.ibm.com \
    --to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncmike@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox