From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Mike D. Day" <ncmike@us.ibm.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH] sysfs support for Xen attributes
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:49:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C67A6E.3060708@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1137080242.5397.37.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Dave Hansen wrote:
>The ppc64 hypervisor does something like this today in a couple of
>places. It is kinda a mess. I think that putting a generic, binary
>firmware interface leads to having a bit of a crutch. It basically lets
>the userspace software stack bypass Linux and talk directly to the
>hypervisor. It also means that you have to have a very specialized
>software stack for each hypervisor or virtualization type, which is very
>bad.
>
>This pushes things out to userspace, which is generally good. But, it
>is pushing behavior and "hardware" knowledge out there, too. The
>hardware knowledge, especially, is something that we usually try to
>encapsulate.
>
>
The Xen virtual hardware is exposed in the normal way (there is a Xen
bus so Xen devices show up under that).
>Also things like inter-partition page sharing, and partition migration
>are used in other hypervisors. I think it is essential to get common
>interfaces to those things.
>
>
In very, very different ways though.
>One last thing... When you say "very strongly binary" do you mean, "are
>implemented now as very strongly binary", or "absolutely 100% have to be
>horribly strongly binary"? They are two quite different things. :)
>
>
To expose the hypercalls to userspace via sysfs (or another high level
interface) would require a whole bunch of complex code to encode the
hypercalls and decode there results. I'm not sure having a common
interface is a compelling argument to justify this kernel-level
complexity since one can just standardize on a userspace library
(something like http://www.libvir.org).
I do agree we need a common interface though...
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>-- Dave
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-12 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-11 17:17 [RFC] [PATCH] sysfs support for Xen attributes Mike D. Day
2006-01-11 17:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-11 17:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-01-11 18:45 ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-11 23:07 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 0:23 ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 0:57 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 1:49 ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 2:17 ` [Xen-devel] " Mark Williamson
2006-01-12 7:10 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 14:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 14:53 ` Mark Williamson
2006-01-12 15:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-01-12 15:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-01-12 17:34 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 18:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-01-12 17:43 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 9:10 ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-12 14:52 ` [Xen-devel] " Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 15:28 ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-12 15:50 ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 12:54 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2006-01-12 13:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-12 14:42 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2006-01-12 17:39 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 18:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-01-12 18:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-12 18:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-01-12 19:11 ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 19:31 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 19:08 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 19:18 ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-12 19:30 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 17:38 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 1:32 ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-12 10:04 ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2006-01-12 15:14 ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-12 15:06 ` Mark Williamson
2006-01-12 15:26 ` Keir Fraser
2006-01-12 15:37 ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-12 15:49 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2006-01-11 23:31 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-12 19:01 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43C67A6E.3060708@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox