From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751512AbWAOARX (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:17:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751476AbWAOARX (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:17:23 -0500 Received: from 8.ctyme.com ([69.50.231.8]:12933 "EHLO darwin.ctyme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751512AbWAOARX (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:17:23 -0500 Message-ID: <43C99491.3080907@perkel.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:17:21 -0800 From: Marc Perkel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: "Hesse, Christian" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: So - What's going on with Reiser 4? References: <43C837B6.5070903@perkel.com> <1137236892.3014.12.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <200601141322.34520.mail@earthworm.de> <1137242691.3014.16.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1137242691.3014.16.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 13:22 +0100, Hesse, Christian wrote: > >> On Saturday 14 January 2006 12:08, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:28 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote: >>> >>>> Still waiting. I thought it was ging to eventually be included. What's >>>> holding it up? >>>> >>> Is someone running a "lets all complain on lkml about reiser4" campaign? >>> This was asked and answered 2 weeks ago, please read the archives. >>> (and it was asked last week and we then pointed at the archives as well) >>> >> Maciej Soltysiak answered the question two weeks ago. But he started his mail >> with "I am not the r4 spokesman [...]". So could anybody write some words who >> really knows? >> > > if you want an answer from the reiserfs people... why don't you ask on > reiserfs-list@namesys.com ... that's the dedicated list after all ;-) > > > I'm sorry - I thought this was a technical forum. I didn't know asking about the status of a merge was a politically incorrect subject. Could someone please post a list of taboo subjects so that I don't ask the wrong question in the future?