From: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
"Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: So - What's going on with Reiser 4?
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:11:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43CA9050.8080601@perkel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1137348569.2350.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sad, 2006-01-14 at 20:34 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>>>> I am not going to search the archives before asking a question.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I just asked a question. Obviously it's a question that seems to
>> politically hot to handle. I didn't realize reiser 4 was a prohibited
>> subject.
>>
>
> Its not. Possibly your behaviour should come under "prohibited attitude"
> but we don't have thought crime on the list beyond that your government
> may be seeking to impose.
>
> Its an "oh god not again" subject that has been beaten to death
> repeatedly, and that is why people asked you to look at the archive
> instead of wasting everyones time.
>
> If you are really keen to get resierfs4 into the base kernel why not
> email the reiserfs4 people and ask to help clean up the code and test
> it ?
>
> Alan
>
Look - all I did was ask a simple question about what was the status of
Reiser 4 and everyone is freaking out that I asked the question. You
guys are acting like you are members of a cult or something. I'm not
advocating anything. I just asked a question.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-15 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-13 23:28 So - What's going on with Reiser 4? Marc Perkel
2006-01-14 11:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-14 12:22 ` Hesse, Christian
2006-01-14 12:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-15 0:17 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-15 2:50 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-15 3:23 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-15 4:25 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-15 4:34 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-15 8:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-15 15:11 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-15 15:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-16 3:24 ` Kurt Wall
2006-01-16 15:59 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-16 20:20 ` Kurt Wall
2006-01-15 18:09 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-15 18:11 ` Marc Perkel [this message]
2006-01-15 18:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-16 2:05 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-20 12:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-20 13:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-01-20 14:47 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-15 11:56 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-14 16:04 ` Ed Tomlinson
2006-01-14 17:23 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43CA9050.8080601@perkel.com \
--to=marc@perkel.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@earthworm.de \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox