public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Waterman <davidmaxwaterman+kernel@fastmail.co.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: io performance...
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:35:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43CB4CC3.4030904@fastmail.co.uk> (raw)

Hi,

I've been referred to this list from the linux-raid list.

I've been playing with a RAID system, trying to obtain best bandwidth
from it.

I've noticed that I consistently get better (read) numbers from kernel 2.6.8
than from later kernels.

For example, I get 135MB/s on 2.6.8, but I typically get ~90MB/s on later
kernels.

I'm using this :

<http://www.sharcnet.ca/~hahn/iorate.c>

to measure the iorate. I'm using the debian distribution. The h/w is a MegaRAID
320-2. The array I'm measuring is a RAID0 of 4 Fujitsu Max3073NC 15Krpm drives.

The later kernels I've been using are :

2.6.12-1-686-smp
2.6.14-2-686-smp
2.6.15-1-686-smp

The kernel which gives us the best results is :

2.6.8-2-386

(note that it's not an smp kernel)

I'm testing on an otherwise idle system.

Any ideas to why this might be? Any other advice/help?

Thanks!

Max.

             reply	other threads:[~2006-01-16  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-16  7:35 Max Waterman [this message]
2006-01-16  7:32 ` io performance Jeff V. Merkey
2006-01-17 13:57   ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-17 19:17     ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-01-16  8:35 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-01-17 17:06 ` Phillip Susi
2006-01-18  7:24   ` Max Waterman
2006-01-18 15:19     ` Phillip Susi
2006-01-20  5:58       ` Max Waterman
2006-01-20 13:42         ` Ian Soboroff
2006-01-25  6:36           ` Max Waterman
2006-01-25 14:19             ` Ian Soboroff
2006-01-25 13:09           ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-18  3:02 ` Max Waterman
2006-01-18  4:30   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-01-18  5:09     ` Max Waterman
2006-01-18  4:37       ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-01-18  7:06         ` Max Waterman
2006-01-18  9:21     ` Alan Cox
2006-01-18 15:48       ` Phillip Susi
2006-01-18 16:25         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2006-01-19  0:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 13:18   ` Max Waterman
     [not found] <5vx8f-1Al-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <5wbRY-3cF-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <5wdKh-5wF-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-19  1:58     ` Robert Hancock
2006-01-19 13:14       ` Max Waterman
2006-01-19 14:08         ` Alan Cox
2006-01-20  4:09           ` Max Waterman
2006-01-20  4:27             ` Alexander Samad
2006-01-20 12:52             ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-19 11:39 Al Boldi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43CB4CC3.4030904@fastmail.co.uk \
    --to=davidmaxwaterman+kernel@fastmail.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox