From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932412AbWAQTh6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:37:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932416AbWAQTh5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:37:57 -0500 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:54190 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932412AbWAQTh5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:37:57 -0500 Message-ID: <43CD4788.3020003@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:37:44 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: rostedt@goodmis.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] mutex subsystem, semaphore to completion: SX8 References: <200601100207.k0A27B4J007573@hera.kernel.org> <43C31F08.304@pobox.com> <20060110100839.GA24106@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20060110100839.GA24106@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "srv2.dvmed.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jeff Garzik wrote: > > >>Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: >> >>>tree c45749fcb6f8f22d9e2666135b528c885856aaed >>>parent 7892f2f48d165a34b0b8130c8a195dfd807b8cb6 >>>author Steven Rostedt Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:59:26 -0800 >>>committer Ingo Molnar Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:59:26 >>>-0800 >>> >>>[PATCH] mutex subsystem, semaphore to completion: SX8 >>> >>>change SX8 semaphores to completions. >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar >> >>Please at least CC the maintainer (me) _sometime_ before pushing >>upstream, when you modify a driver... > > > sorry, my bad - this patch grew out of -rt where it initially was a > quick hack and then found its way into the mutex tree. Should i send a > reverse patch to Linus, or is this change fine with you? [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [69.134.188.146 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jeff Garzik wrote: > > >>Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: >> >>>tree c45749fcb6f8f22d9e2666135b528c885856aaed >>>parent 7892f2f48d165a34b0b8130c8a195dfd807b8cb6 >>>author Steven Rostedt Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:59:26 -0800 >>>committer Ingo Molnar Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:59:26 >>>-0800 >>> >>>[PATCH] mutex subsystem, semaphore to completion: SX8 >>> >>>change SX8 semaphores to completions. >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar >> >>Please at least CC the maintainer (me) _sometime_ before pushing >>upstream, when you modify a driver... > > > sorry, my bad - this patch grew out of -rt where it initially was a > quick hack and then found its way into the mutex tree. Should i send a > reverse patch to Linus, or is this change fine with you? Looks fine... Jeff