From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>,
Cynbe ru Taren <cynbe@muq.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FYI: RAID5 unusably unstable through 2.6.14
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:53:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43CFB60B.2090703@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17358.53535.449726.814333@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Neil Brown wrote:
>
> Very recent 2.6 kernels do exactly this. They don't drop a drive on a
> read error, only on a write error. On a read error they generate the
> data from elsewhere and schedule a write, then a re-read.
Well done, then. Further to this:
Pardon me for not looking at the specifics of the code here,
but experience shows that rewriting just the single sector
is often not enough to repair an error. The drive often just
continues to fail when only the bad sector is rewritten by itself.
Dumb drives, or what, I don't know, but they seem to respond
better when the entire physical track is rewritten.
Since we rarely know what a physical track is these days,
this often boils down to simply rewriting a 64KB chunk
centered on the failed sector. So far, this strategy has
always worked for me.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-19 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-17 19:35 FYI: RAID5 unusably unstable through 2.6.14 Cynbe ru Taren
2006-01-17 19:39 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-01-17 20:13 ` Martin Drab
2006-01-17 23:39 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-18 2:30 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-02 20:33 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-03 0:57 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 1:13 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 15:41 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-03 16:13 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 16:38 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-03 17:22 ` Roger Heflin
2006-02-03 19:38 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-03 17:51 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 19:10 ` Roger Heflin
2006-02-03 19:12 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 19:41 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-03 19:45 ` Martin Drab
2006-01-17 19:56 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-17 19:58 ` David R
2006-01-17 20:00 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-17 23:27 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-18 0:12 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-18 11:24 ` Erik Mouw
2006-01-18 0:21 ` Phillip Susi
2006-01-18 0:29 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-18 2:10 ` Phillip Susi
2006-01-18 3:01 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-18 16:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-01-18 16:47 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-02-02 22:10 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-08 21:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-18 10:54 ` Helge Hafting
2006-01-18 16:15 ` Mark Lord
2006-01-18 17:32 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-19 15:59 ` Mark Lord
2006-01-19 16:25 ` Alan Cox
2006-02-08 14:46 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-18 23:37 ` Neil Brown
2006-01-19 15:53 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2006-01-19 0:13 ` Neil Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-03 17:00 Salyzyn, Mark
2006-02-03 17:39 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 19:46 ` Phillip Susi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43CFB60B.2090703@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=cynbe@muq.org \
--cc=helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox