From: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
To: Martin Drab <drab@kepler.fjfi.cvut.cz>
Cc: govind raj <agovinda04@hotmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 5+0 support
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:06:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43CFE34F.8060309@cfl.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0601191933250.14341@kepler.fjfi.cvut.cz>
Martin Drab wrote:
> Speed is the issue here, I believe. By stripping two RAID-5 arrays you
> ought to get the reliability of the RAID-5 but with considerably higher
> speed. That's basically why RAID-50 exists, I think.
One big raid-5 would have higher speed because it would have one more
disk allocated to storing data rather than more parity. The raid 5+0
isn't really going to be any more reliable because it can withstand a
single failure in either half, but not two failures in one half, so in
the face of a double failure, you have a 50/50 chance of one being in
each half.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-19 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 16:52 RAID 5+0 support govind raj
2006-01-19 17:12 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-19 17:26 ` Phillip Susi
2006-01-19 18:07 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2006-01-19 18:36 ` Martin Drab
2006-01-19 19:06 ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2006-01-19 20:14 ` Martin Drab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43CFE34F.8060309@cfl.rr.com \
--to=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
--cc=agovinda04@hotmail.com \
--cc=drab@kepler.fjfi.cvut.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox