From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Wei Yongjun <weiyj@soft.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]ip_options_fragment() has no effect on fragmentation
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:46:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D88C4F.7080302@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a3101c6229a$3cc7c1b0$cfa0220a@WeiYJ>
Wei Yongjun wrote:
> [1]Summary of the problem:
> ip_options_fragment() has no effect on fragmentation
>
> [2]Full description of the problem:
> When I send IPv4 packet(contain Record Route Option) which need to be
> fragmented to the router, the router can not fragment it correctly.
> After fragmented by router, the second fragmentation still contain
> Record Route Option. Refer to RFC791, Record Route Option must Not be
> copied on fragmentation, goes in first fragment only.
> ip_options_fragment() is the implemental function, but there are some
> BUGs in it:
>
> ip_option.c: line 207:
> void ip_options_fragment(struct sk_buff * skb)
> {
> unsigned char * optptr = skb->nh.raw;
> struct ip_options * opt = &(IPCB(skb)->opt);
> ...
>
> optptr get a error pointer to the ipv4 options, correct is as following:
>
> unsigned char * optptr = skb->nh.raw + sizeof(struct iphdr);
>
> By the way, ip_options_fragment() just fill options not allowed in
> fragments with NOOPs, does not delete the space of the options,
> following patch has corrected the problem.
Please split the optptr fix and your enhancements in two patches and
send them to netdev@vger.kernel.org.
BTW, your mailer corrupts whitespace.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-26 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-26 17:02 [PATCH]ip_options_fragment() has no effect on fragmentation Wei Yongjun
2006-01-26 5:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-26 8:46 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43D88C4F.7080302@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weiyj@soft.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox