From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@sgi.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: boot-time slowdown for measure_migration_cost
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:08:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43DA99EB.6020909@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F058CC7A6@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
Luck, Tony wrote:
>>The boot-time migration cost auto-tuning stuff seems to have
>>been merged to Linus' tree since 2.6.15. On little one- or
>>two-processor systems, the time required to measure the
>>migration costs isn't very noticeable, but by the time we
>>get to even a four-processor ia64 box, it adds about
>>30 seconds to the boot time, which seems like a lot.
>
>
> I only see about 16 seconds for a 4-way tiger (not that 16 seconds
> is good ... but it not as bad as 30). This was with a build
> from tiger_defconfig that sets CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4 ... so I wonder
> what's causing the factor of two. I measured with a printk
> each side of build_sched_domains() and booted with the "time"
> command line arg to get:
I've noticed the delay on a 16p and 64p. At first I thought it was a
system hang but have since learned to live with the delay.
What happens on a 512 cpu
> Altix (if it's quadratic, they may be still waiting for the
> boot to finish :-)
Not quadratic. This is a 64p Altix ...
[ 9.942253] Brought up 64 CPUs
[ 9.942904] Total of 64 processors activated (143654.91 BogoMIPS).
[ 9.943995] build_sched_domains: start
[ 32.108439] migration_cost=0,32232,39021
[ 37.894391] build_sched_domains: end
P.
>
> -Tony
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-27 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-27 21:48 boot-time slowdown for measure_migration_cost Luck, Tony
2006-01-27 22:08 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-01 0:50 Chuck Ebbert
2006-01-27 21:03 Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-30 17:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-30 18:53 ` Luck, Tony
2006-01-30 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-30 20:00 ` Luck, Tony
2006-01-30 20:43 ` Prarit Bhargava
2006-01-30 20:52 ` Prarit Bhargava
2006-01-30 20:43 ` John Hawkes
2006-01-30 19:26 ` Chen, Kenneth W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43DA99EB.6020909@sgi.com \
--to=prarit@sgi.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox