From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>
To: Hai Zaar <haizaar@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: vesa fb is slow on 2.6.15.1
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:02:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43DAC2B1.7060708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfb54190601271654i8a001b7y5c37b27e2e7fa0ed@mail.gmail.com>
Hai Zaar wrote:
> On 1/28/06, Antonino A. Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hai Zaar wrote:
>>>> Looks harmless to me.
>>>>
>>>> Can you check /proc/iomem just to verify if that particular address has
>>>> been reserved by the OS.
>>> Relevant iomem entries are:
>>> f0000000-f7ffffff : PCI Bus #40
>>> f0000000-f7ffffff : 0000:40:00.0
>>> f0000000-f7ffffff : vesafb
>>> f8000000-f9ffffff : PCI Bus #40
>>> f8000000-f8ffffff : 0000:40:00.0
>>> f9000000-f9ffffff : 0000:40:00.0
>>> After I load nvidia.ko, it changes to:
>>> f0000000-f7ffffff : PCI Bus #40
>>> f0000000-f7ffffff : 0000:40:00.0
>>> f0000000-f7ffffff : vesafb
>>> f8000000-f9ffffff : PCI Bus #40
>>> f8000000-f8ffffff : 0000:40:00.0
>> ^^^^^^^^
>> Yes, this address range (16M) is already allocated to resource #0
>> of the nvidia card. So trying to allocate resource #6 on the same
>> address looks bogus to me.
>
> Ok. What now?
Well, it looks to me like a harmless message and I'll just ignore it, I think,
as long as the affected pci device works properly.
> I've rebooted without 'vga' and 'video' parameters at all - the error stays.
>
> BTW: How do you know that its allocated to resource #0 - are resource
> numbers written somewhere in /proc/iomem and I've missed it?
This was part of your lspci:
Region 0: Memory at f8000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
Region 1: Memory at f0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M]
Region 3: Memory at f9000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
See region 0.
Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-28 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-26 14:20 vesa fb is slow on 2.6.15.1 Hai Zaar
2006-01-26 14:51 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-01-26 16:06 ` Hai Zaar
2006-01-26 16:40 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-26 22:04 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-01-27 0:10 ` Hai Zaar
2006-01-27 0:19 ` Hai Zaar
2006-01-27 6:02 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-01-27 16:32 ` Hai Zaar
2006-01-27 17:21 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-01-28 0:31 ` Hai Zaar
[not found] ` <cfb54190601271628j774df3d0xce0ab24c8abca845@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <43DABCF6.4000904@gmail.com>
2006-01-28 0:54 ` Hai Zaar
2006-01-28 1:02 ` Antonino A. Daplas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43DAC2B1.7060708@gmail.com \
--to=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=haizaar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox