From: Stephen Clark <stephen.clark@earthlink.net>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>,
Panagiotis Issaris <takis.issaris@uhasselt.be>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WLAN drivers
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:18:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43E39E77.90403@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1138990013.15691.272.camel@mindpipe>
Lee Revell wrote:
>On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 12:35 +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
>
>
>>In my experience, you're simply best going to either
>>http://prism54.org/ (if you can find one still) or http://madwifi.org/
>>(modern cards, likely to be purchasable), and then buying one of the
>>cards on the "known to work" lists. If you buy the wrong revision,
>>return it.
>>
>>
>
>Isn't madwifi a proprietary driver? Are things really so bad that
>people on LKML are recommending users buy this junk?
>
>Lee
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
I'd been waiting for along time to get a wireless card for my Linux
system at a reasonable price. A couple of weeks ago CompUSA had zyxel
g102's fo 19.95 and zyxel base stations
for 19.95 - no rebates were involved:) So I got one of each. The pc-card
uses an atheros chip
which is supported by MadWifi. The module includes a binary hal module
that keeps the
card from being abused - programmed out of FCC specs. Why is so
different from a card that
has to have firmware loaded on it that in essence does the same thing -
prevents the driver
writer from programming the card out of FCC specs.
And Atheros stepped up to the table and provide this hal binary piece.
My $.02
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-03 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-03 12:18 WLAN drivers Panagiotis Issaris
2006-02-03 12:35 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-02-03 18:06 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-03 18:18 ` Stephen Clark [this message]
2006-02-03 18:33 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-05 3:46 ` Luke-Jr
2006-02-03 19:14 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-02-03 19:19 ` Joel Jaeggli
2006-02-03 19:35 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-03 18:44 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-03 14:24 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-02-03 18:49 ` Jan Kiszka
[not found] ` <mailman.1138977902.23981.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2006-02-03 19:14 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-02-03 19:22 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-02-03 19:38 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-14 16:07 ` David Gómez
2006-02-03 19:32 ` Alessandro Suardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43E39E77.90403@earthlink.net \
--to=stephen.clark@earthlink.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=sclark46@earthlink.net \
--cc=takis.issaris@uhasselt.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox